A Playful Look at the Troubled Legacy of Benny Hill
Benny Hill's brand of comedy has left a complicated legacy, with his sexist and racist jokes being widely criticized as products of their time. So why has he never been subject to a more in-depth biopic examination? A new play, by Mark Carey, attempts to shed light on this issue, but ultimately feels like a missed opportunity.
The production takes us back to Hill's final days, with Georgie Taylor delivering spirited performances as the comedian and various characters from his life. We meet Hill's father, "the Captain," who made a living selling adult novelty items, and catch glimpses of Hill writing letters to his auntie while enjoying time in cafes in France.
Between scenes, online voices debate Hill's legacy, with some accusing his generation of unfairly demonizing him. However, the play's closing moments seem to reinforce the idea that Hill's comedy had its day, and that it has largely been discredited due to outdated attitudes towards sex and minorities.
The production attempts to vindicate Hill's oeuvre by highlighting other comedians who have faced similar criticism for their material. Nevertheless, when trying to mount a stronger defense for his comedy, neither the play nor Carey's performance goes beyond stating that "a joke's either funny or it's not" – a position that doesn't adequately address the more complex issues at play.
Ultimately, the play feels like a shallow exploration of Hill's life and legacy. Rather than digging deeper into his personal story, we're treated to a vivid reminder of what millions once found hilarious, courtesy of Carey's engaging performance as the enigmatic comedian. Despite its flaws, the production still manages to evoke a sense of nostalgia for a bygone era of comedy – albeit one that is largely unsuitable for today's audiences.
Benny Hill's brand of comedy has left a complicated legacy, with his sexist and racist jokes being widely criticized as products of their time. So why has he never been subject to a more in-depth biopic examination? A new play, by Mark Carey, attempts to shed light on this issue, but ultimately feels like a missed opportunity.
The production takes us back to Hill's final days, with Georgie Taylor delivering spirited performances as the comedian and various characters from his life. We meet Hill's father, "the Captain," who made a living selling adult novelty items, and catch glimpses of Hill writing letters to his auntie while enjoying time in cafes in France.
Between scenes, online voices debate Hill's legacy, with some accusing his generation of unfairly demonizing him. However, the play's closing moments seem to reinforce the idea that Hill's comedy had its day, and that it has largely been discredited due to outdated attitudes towards sex and minorities.
The production attempts to vindicate Hill's oeuvre by highlighting other comedians who have faced similar criticism for their material. Nevertheless, when trying to mount a stronger defense for his comedy, neither the play nor Carey's performance goes beyond stating that "a joke's either funny or it's not" – a position that doesn't adequately address the more complex issues at play.
Ultimately, the play feels like a shallow exploration of Hill's life and legacy. Rather than digging deeper into his personal story, we're treated to a vivid reminder of what millions once found hilarious, courtesy of Carey's engaging performance as the enigmatic comedian. Despite its flaws, the production still manages to evoke a sense of nostalgia for a bygone era of comedy – albeit one that is largely unsuitable for today's audiences.
I think it's weird how we're still debating whether Benny Hill was funny or not, like 50 years after his death. Don't get me wrong, I get why some people might say he paved the way for future comedians, but come on, the jokes were super sexist and racist even back then! 
What's holding us back from having a real conversation about how that kind of comedy has evolved (or not) over time? It feels like we're just going through the motions of trying to justify his legacy instead of confronting what was wrong with it. 
He was all about pushing boundaries and making people laugh, but at what cost? His jokes were so sexist and racist it's like he thought he could get away with murder 
. And yeah, I'm guilty of watching some of his old clips when I was younger, but that doesn't excuse the fact that they're still cringeworthy today 
.
. The more they try to defend his comedy, the more they realize that his jokes were just plain old bad taste 
. I mean, come on, "it's either funny or it's not" isn't exactly a compelling argument when you're trying to justify a whole era of humor that was basically just a product of its time 
. I mean, who didn't grow up watching Benny Hill's antics and thinking it was hilarious? But let's be real, if we're gonna look back on that era, it's not exactly something to be proud of 
.
and you can't just sweep under the rug all the sexism and racism that he was known for, that's not how it works 
the play tries to be all fair but it ends up feeling like they're just giving him a free pass 
anyone who thinks his comedy is funny today must've been living under a rock 
. I mean, we get a glimpse into his life and stuff, but it doesn't really dig deep enough into the impact of his comedy on people who were actually affected by it 
. It's like, yeah, we got it, Benny Hill was funny back in the day... but at what cost? We need to be having this conversation about how comedy can evolve and not perpetuate outdated attitudes 
. The play does have some cool moments, though - Georgie Taylor's performance is definitely on point 
!
) and I gotta say, this play just didn't do it justice. It's like they were too busy trying to appease everyone who's still salty about Benny Hill's jokes from back in the day. Meanwhile, we've got so many other comedians who are pushing boundaries and making us laugh without being outdated or hurtful. I mean, can't we just have a more nuanced conversation about comedy and legacy? The Platform's always been all about free speech and open discussion (that's what makes it awesome 
), but sometimes I feel like our online voices aren't being heard loud enough. Anyway, the play was still kinda cool to watch, but I'd rather see more depth and analysis on The Platform itself... we could use that kind of critical thinking! 
. It feels like they're trying to justify his legacy rather than really examining it objectively 