Wikipedia Has Its Own Version of 'Wrapped' Now, But There's One Little Problem

Wikipedia Goes All Out with Personalized 'Wrapped' Review - But Excludes Desktop Users

As the new year approaches, many tech giants are stepping up their game by releasing personalized year-end reviews to their users. Spotify and Apple Music led this trend with their iconic "Wrapped" features in 2015. Now, Wikipedia has joined the bandwagon, but there's a significant catch: its mobile app users only get access to these statistics.

The online encyclopedia is now sharing a year-in-review format on its mobile app, offering users insights into how much time they spent reading articles on the platform, visiting different topics, and engaging with other content. If you don't have the Wikipedia app, it's still worth installing as this feature might become available for desktop users in the future.

Beyond individual user statistics, Wikipedia also provides a bird's-eye view of its overall performance. According to the Wikimedia Foundation, 4.6 billion hours were spent reading articles on the platform this year, with English-language content accounting for more than half that time. Notably, volunteer editors made over 66 million edits in just one year.

In terms of popular content, Wikipedia shared some remarkable insights. Pope Leo XIV's article was a highlight, topping the list as the most-read article in May and landing fifth place overall. New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani's page, meanwhile, secured seventh spot with 20 million visits, largely driven by interest during June's Democratic mayoral primary.

The world of entertainment had an unexpected presence on Wikipedia's year-end report, as several movies and TV shows like "Thunderbolts" and "Sinners" broke into the top 20. Conversely, a dark horse contender emerged in the form of Ed Gein's serial killer page, which garnered 31 million views likely fueled by the Netflix series "Monster: The Ed Gein Story".

Other notable mentions included Wikipedia's list of deaths in 2025 and an article on Charlie Kirk, with 42 million and 44.9 million views respectively.
 
omg can u believe wikipedia finally got its act together πŸ˜‚πŸ“Š now we get personalized reviews too? like i was just reading this and thought "wait a minute, when's my turn to see how much time i wasted on wikipedia 🀣" anyway, 4.6 billion hours spent reading articles? that's some serious wiki love πŸ’– i mean who needs spotify wrapped when u can have wikipedia wrapped? but seriously, 66 million edits in one year? those volunteer editors are literally the real MVPs πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸ€” Wikipedia just released their 'Wrapped' review thingy, but only for mobile users πŸ“±... that's a bit weird, right? I mean, what about all the desktop folk who don't have the app? Can't they get in on the fun either? πŸ™„

Anyway, apparently 4.6 billion hours were spent reading articles this year 🀯... and some popular stuff like Pope Leo XIV's article was a hot mess πŸ’₯. And those volunteer editors made some crazy edits - over 66 million in one year! πŸ‘

But let me ask you, what's the point of having all that data if we can't even get access to it on our desktops? πŸ€” It feels like Wikipedia is just trying to sell us on a mobile-only experience... πŸ“Š Not sure I'm convinced yet πŸ˜’
 
Ugh, can you believe it? 🀯 Wikipedia is giving Spotify a run for its money with this personalized review feature, but only mobile users get to see it. I mean, what's the point of having an entire encyclopedia if we can't access all of it on desktop? It's like they're trying to keep us in the dark... or should I say, in the 'wrapped' content πŸ“. But hey, at least they're sharing some cool stats and insights about user engagement, and who knew Pope Leo XIV was a total page-view champion? πŸ˜‚ I'm also loving the unexpected appearance of "Thunderbolts" and Ed Gein's serial killer page – it's like Wikipedia is keeping us on our toes. Still, can't help but feel that desktop users are getting left behind... πŸ€”
 
Yooo, what's good fam? So Wikipedia just dropped its own version of that popular 'Wrapped' review thingy but only on mobile πŸ“±πŸ‘€ I'm lowkey salty about it tho, desktop users like me are gettin left out in the cold πŸ˜’ still, gotta give props to Wikipedia for bringin some sick stats. 4.6 billion hours spent readin articles this year? That's wild! 🀯 And Pope Leo XIV's article was a real surprise topper πŸ’₯ meanwhile, Ed Gein's page went from nowhere to monster hits...Netflix series, anyone? πŸ“Ί
 
Ugh, what's going on here? πŸ€” Wikipedia is finally giving users personalized reviews, but I still can't get to see it on desktop! Like, come on! Can't they just make the app compatible with all devices already? 🚫 It's so annoying that I have to download their app just to use this feature. And what's up with some articles being more popular than others? Who cares about Ed Gein's serial killer page getting 31 million views? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Can't we get more info on actual events or people instead of random weird stuff? πŸ€”
 
I'm so stoked that Wikipedia is getting in on the personalized review action 🀩! I mean, who doesn't love a good year-in-review summary, right? And it's awesome that they're sharing some fun facts like Pope Leo XIV being the most-read article in May (talk about a historical surprise πŸ˜‚). But what really gets me excited is that these statistics are giving us a glimpse into just how much time people are spending reading and learning on Wikipedia - 4.6 billion hours? That's insane! 🀯 It's a great reminder of the importance of online resources like this, especially for education and research. And I'm loving the fact that they're highlighting volunteer editors who are making a real impact (66 million edits in one year? Mind blown πŸ’₯). Bring on the desktop version, I say! πŸ“Š
 
I'm loving this 'Wrapped' feature on Wikipedia's mobile app! 🀩 It's so cool to see how much time I spend reading articles on the platform and exploring different topics. And wow, 4.6 billion hours spent reading? That's crazy! But it would be awesome if they expanded this feature to desktop users too... like, can't we have a little bit of everything? 😊 Still, I'm glad I downloaded the app just in case. Those 66 million edits by volunteer editors? Mind-blowing! And some cool mentions on popular content, from movies and TV shows to true crime stories... it's amazing what Wikipedia is covering. Maybe next year they'll add more entertainment sections? A thought 😊
 
I don't get why they're making a big deal about this... I mean, sure, it's cool that you can see how much time you spent reading Wikipedia articles on your phone, but what's the point of only sharing that with mobile users? Can't we just have access to our own year-in-review stats on desktop too? It feels like they're trying to nickel-and-dime us or something 😐. And I'm also curious about why they're highlighting some random Wikipedia pages like Pope Leo XIV and Ed Gein's page... are people really that interested in those guys? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” Wikipedia's Wrapped review is pretty cool, but I wish they'd include desktop users too. I mean, who doesn't want to see how much time they spent reading articles on the platform? πŸ“Š It's still good that they're sharing stats about volunteer editors, though - 66 million edits in one year? That's crazy! πŸ’₯ And it's wild that some movies and TV shows are making an appearance on Wikipedia's most-read list. "Thunderbolts" is not even a real movie... πŸŽ₯ Guess you have to be interested in weird stuff to get into the top 20. πŸ‘€
 
I gotta say 🀯, this is a major bummer for desktop users! I mean, what's up with that? They're basically making us mobile users feel special or something πŸ™„. I don't mind the extra stats, but why can't we get 'em on our laptops too? It's just so... uneven πŸ˜’.

And omg, did you see the most-read article? Pope Leo XIV?! Who knew? πŸ˜‚ Not me, that's for sure! But in all seriousness, it's cool to see what's trending. I mean, 31 million views on Ed Gein's page? That's wild 🀯. And a TV show breaking into Wikipedia's top 20? Talk about internet phenomenon πŸ‘€.

I guess this just means we mobile users need to stay vigilant and get that Wikipedia app πŸ“±. Can't have us feeling left out in the dark πŸ”¦. On the bright side, it'll be cool when they finally roll out a desktop version... fingers crossed 🀞!
 
omg you guys think wikipedia is just for academics? nope it's got some wild stats 🀯 like pope leo xiv was the most read in may? what's next gonna be a wiki page about your aunt's birthday cake recipe? 🍰 and btw what's with the desktop users being left out? shouldn't they get a slice of that pie too? 🍞
 
OMG, yeah I think its kinda cool that wikipedia is jumping on this personalized review bandwagon 🀩! especially since they're doing it for mobile users first, like they gotta make sure everyone has access to it before opening it up to desktop users πŸ“±πŸ‘. I'm also low-key stoked about the stats they shared - 4.6 billion hours spent reading articles? that's wild! 🀯 and those volunteer editors made over 66 million edits in one year? wikipedia community is literally the best πŸ’–.

and hahaha, Pope Leo XIV was a top read in may? no way, I wouldn't have pegged him as a Wikipedia hotshot πŸ˜‚. but you know what's even crazier? Ed Gein's page breaking into the top 20... like, who knew he'd be so popular after that Netflix show came out πŸ“Ί? and those deaths article and Charlie Kirk article getting so many views? wikipedia really is covering it all πŸ“°πŸ‘€.
 
OMG, like what's up with Wikipedia only sharing this year-end review thingy with mobile app users? πŸ€” I mean, I'm all about being convenient and whatnot, but desktop users get left out in the cold πŸ˜’. On the bright side, it's still cool to see these statistics on how we spend our time reading articles, visiting different topics... all that jazz πŸ“š.

And wow, 4.6 billion hours spent reading articles? That's like, a lot of cat videos watched or memes scrolled through lol 😹. The fact that volunteer editors made over 66 million edits in just one year is also pretty wild 🀯. I'm glad to see some popular content insights too, like Pope Leo XIV's article being the most-read in May πŸ“Š.

But seriously, why no desktop users? Are they planning on bringing it over or something? πŸ€” Also, 31 million views for Ed Gein's page? That's... quite a dark horse contender 😹. What do you guys think about Wikipedia's year-end review feature? Do you have any thoughts? πŸ€”
 
omg i just got the most epic wifi signal at my aunties house in tokyo πŸŒ΄πŸ“± has anyone else ever experienced that? it's like my laptop is flying ✈️ anyway back to wikipedia... did you know that ed gein's page was a dark horse contender for top 20 most viewed articles? i mean, who knew the original 'zombie' was so fascinating? πŸ§ πŸ‘» also, pope leo xiv's article being the most-read in may is pretty cool. reminds me of my favorite history book in school πŸ“š what's your take on wikipedia's year-end report?
 
I'm kinda bummed that desktop users aren't getting access to this 'Wrapped' review thingy yet πŸ€”. I mean, I get it, mobile apps are where most people spend their time these days, but still... Wikipedia is so comprehensive and has such a huge user base - it'd be awesome if we could see those stats too! πŸ“Š And what's up with all the crazy popular content like movies and TV shows? Is that really who's searching for Ed Gein on Wikipedia? πŸ˜‚ Still, I guess it's cool to get some insight into how people are using the site and all... πŸ‘
 
πŸ€” so wikipedia finally joined the personalized review party but only for mobile users? that seems a bit odd to me πŸ“± what about desktop users who are also paying attention to their browsing habits? shouldn't they be included too? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ on the bright side, it's still a great way for new users to check out wikipedia and see how much time they spend reading articles... maybe one day they'll add that feature to the desktop app too 😊
 
🀯 OMG, can you believe it?! So Wikipedia is finally joining the party and doing their own 'Wrapped' thing... but they're EXCLUDING desktop users 🚫?! Like what even is that? Are we gonna have to use their app just because of this "personalization" nonsense? πŸ™„ Newsflash: not everyone wants to be glued to their screen 24/7. I mean, who needs to see how much time they've spent reading Wikipedia when you could be out there getting some real knowledge in the books πŸ“šπŸ‘€

And don't even get me started on the weird stuff they're sharing... like Ed Gein's page being a dark horse contender? Like what does that have to do with anything?! And movies and TV shows breaking into Wikipedia's year-end report? Are we living in some kind of alternate reality here? πŸŽ₯πŸ‘€

I'm soooo not installing the Wikipedia app just because of this... I'll stick to my trusty ol' browser, thank you very much πŸ˜‚.
 
omg I'm so surprised Wikipedia didn't include desktop users for this feature 🀯! still, it's awesome that they're stepping up their game and sharing some crazy stats πŸ“Š like 4.6 billion hours spent reading articles on the platform! that's insane! and to think Pope Leo XIV's article was a highlight in May πŸ™ I wonder if this is a sign of Wikipedia's growing importance in popular culture πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” I'm kinda surprised Wikipedia didn't include desktop users in their 'Wrapped' review thingy... it makes sense they're targeting the mobile crowd first tho πŸ“±. But honestly, who doesn't love getting a personalized year-in-review on their phone? πŸ“Š It's like, isn't that what 'Wrapped' is all about?! And I gotta say, 4.6 billion hours spent reading Wikipedia articles this year? That's crazy! 🀯 The fact that volunteer editors made over 66 million edits in one year? Mind blown 😲.
 
Back
Top