Corporate America's Silence on Gun Control is Deafening
When mass shootings occur across the US, one group of individuals that Americans often rely on for guidance and advocacy are CEOs. Their influence and financial power make them a crucial part of shaping public opinion on critical issues such as gun control. However, in recent times, it has become increasingly evident that corporate America is staying quiet on this pressing matter.
In 2017, major CEOs from across the country came together to oppose North Carolina's transgender bathroom law. In 2019 and again this summer, nearly 150 major companies – including Lululemon, Lyft, Bain Capital, Bloomberg LP, Permanente Medical Group, and Unilever – called gun violence a "public health crisis" and demanded that the US Senate pass legislation to address it.
But when there's been a mass shooting at a school in Nashville, the silence from corporate America is jarring. It appears that CEOs are waiting for others to join them in advocating for change.
Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale professor who has a direct line to major CEOs around the globe, attributes this complacency to the fact that CEOs have taken a strong stance on various issues but haven't done enough to push the needle on gun control legislation. "They're not there as hired hands of shareholders to fill the role of politicians and civic leaders," he said. "They want to join the chorus, but they don't want to be the only one singing."
Sonnenfeld emphasizes that social capital is just as valuable as financial capital for CEOs. They understand that public trust is essential, but they need the rest of civil society to join them in advocating for change.
It's not that CEOs have lost their will to advocate, but rather that they've become frustrated with being expected to solve every issue on their own. When asked if CEOs hold significant influence over campaign contributions, Sonnenfeld replied that this perception is 100% wrong. Since the 2020 elections, there has been a significant decrease in campaign contributions from big businesses.
The recent example of Tesla's sales falling short of production highlights the disconnect between corporate America's words and actions on gun control. Despite CEO Elon Musk's claims of strong demand for lower-priced vehicles, the company still produced more cars than it sold in the first quarter of this year.
When mass shootings occur across the US, one group of individuals that Americans often rely on for guidance and advocacy are CEOs. Their influence and financial power make them a crucial part of shaping public opinion on critical issues such as gun control. However, in recent times, it has become increasingly evident that corporate America is staying quiet on this pressing matter.
In 2017, major CEOs from across the country came together to oppose North Carolina's transgender bathroom law. In 2019 and again this summer, nearly 150 major companies – including Lululemon, Lyft, Bain Capital, Bloomberg LP, Permanente Medical Group, and Unilever – called gun violence a "public health crisis" and demanded that the US Senate pass legislation to address it.
But when there's been a mass shooting at a school in Nashville, the silence from corporate America is jarring. It appears that CEOs are waiting for others to join them in advocating for change.
Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale professor who has a direct line to major CEOs around the globe, attributes this complacency to the fact that CEOs have taken a strong stance on various issues but haven't done enough to push the needle on gun control legislation. "They're not there as hired hands of shareholders to fill the role of politicians and civic leaders," he said. "They want to join the chorus, but they don't want to be the only one singing."
Sonnenfeld emphasizes that social capital is just as valuable as financial capital for CEOs. They understand that public trust is essential, but they need the rest of civil society to join them in advocating for change.
It's not that CEOs have lost their will to advocate, but rather that they've become frustrated with being expected to solve every issue on their own. When asked if CEOs hold significant influence over campaign contributions, Sonnenfeld replied that this perception is 100% wrong. Since the 2020 elections, there has been a significant decrease in campaign contributions from big businesses.
The recent example of Tesla's sales falling short of production highlights the disconnect between corporate America's words and actions on gun control. Despite CEO Elon Musk's claims of strong demand for lower-priced vehicles, the company still produced more cars than it sold in the first quarter of this year.
. I mean, they've taken a stand on some pretty hot issues like LGBTQ+ rights and racial justice, but when it's something as simple as saving lives, they just disappear 
. It's like they're waiting for someone else to lead the way, which is not exactly how leadership works 
.
. It's frustrating because you'd think that with all the power and influence they have, they'd at least try to speak up on something as important as gun control 
.
. Like, Elon Musk saying Tesla's going to produce more affordable cars than sell them? That sounds like a total PR stunt 
. We need CEOs who are willing to put their money where their mouth is and actually do something about gun control 
.
We need more companies speaking out and using their power to push for real reform, not just giving lip service 
.
It's like they're playing a game of "let's raise awareness" while the real work gets done by activists and lawmakers 
.
. But can they really just sit back and wait for someone else to take the lead? I don't think so! 
They need to use their social capital (not just financial capital) to bring about real change 
.
. If 150 major companies are willing to speak out, then what's stopping the rest from doing the same? It's time for corporate America to step up and take action 
. It's all about timing and PR, folks! 
And let's not forget, these CEOs are getting paid handsomely to think and act on issues that affect the greater good... yet they're choosing not to 
. The average annual cost of a single mass shooting in the US? $15 million 
. But let's not sugarcoat it – silence from corporate America when it matters most can be damaging 
But then again, when there's a mass shooting in Nashville, it's all quiet from the usual suspects... 
Like, where's Elon Musk when we need him, lol? 
And what's with this "social capital" thing, Sonnenfeld says CEOs have... 
The fact that Tesla's sales fell short of production highlights how hollow some of these corporate claims can be. 
. It's like they're waiting for the public to demand change, but what if no one's demanding it? 
. And let's be real, if Elon Musk can make Tesla lose money on sales 
, how hard is it for him and other CEOs to push for actual change? 
It just doesn't add up to me 
it's like they think someone else is gonna pick up the slack and push for change. newsflash: CEOs aren't just about making shareholders happy, they've got social capital to lose too 
. and what's with this "we need public trust" crap? can't they see that their silence on gun control is actually hurting the very people they claim to care about? 
but now its like theyre waiting for others to join in or something? and the fact that they havent done more to push for change is kinda frustrating 