Conversion therapy: a poisonous legacy threatening to revive itself
The US Supreme Court is about to render its verdict on whether conversion therapy, a discredited practice aimed at changing an individual's sexual orientation from gay to straight, infringes upon constitutionally protected free speech. The high-stakes case has sent shockwaves through the LGBTQ+ community, leaving anguished survivors fearing for their lives.
Conceived in the 1950s by psychoanalysts seeking to "cure" homosexuality as a mental illness, conversion therapy was widely discredited decades ago. Yet, despite mounting evidence that it doesn't work and is potentially devastating for minors, some are now advocating for its reinstatement.
Studies have shown that youth subjected to conversion practices are at risk of depression, anxiety, drug use, homelessness, and even suicidal thoughts. National mental health associations recommend prohibiting the practice due to its fundamentally homophobic assumptions about diverse sexual orientations and gender identities.
Twenty-three US states have already banned conversion therapy for minors. The Movement Advancement Project reports these efforts as a necessary step to protect vulnerable young people from this toxic practice.
However, the Trump administration appears determined to revive conversion therapy, with a Department of Health and Human Services report suggesting that it might be effective in changing an individual's sexual orientation.
Critics argue that this stance ignores decades of scientific research demonstrating that conversion therapy is not only ineffective but also damaging. As former patients themselves attest, being subjected to such treatment can have lasting effects on mental health and well-being.
The US Supreme Court's decision will not only impact the lives of LGBTQ+ individuals but also set a precedent for future challenges to civil rights protections. The outcome raises concerns about how far this administration is willing to go in its assault on marginalized communities, including immigrants, women, disabled individuals, African Americans, and more.
As Ben Franklin once said, "We must all hang together or we will all hang separately." In the face of such hostility, it's crucial for communities to come together to resist these attacks and advocate for justice, equality, and human rights.
The US Supreme Court is about to render its verdict on whether conversion therapy, a discredited practice aimed at changing an individual's sexual orientation from gay to straight, infringes upon constitutionally protected free speech. The high-stakes case has sent shockwaves through the LGBTQ+ community, leaving anguished survivors fearing for their lives.
Conceived in the 1950s by psychoanalysts seeking to "cure" homosexuality as a mental illness, conversion therapy was widely discredited decades ago. Yet, despite mounting evidence that it doesn't work and is potentially devastating for minors, some are now advocating for its reinstatement.
Studies have shown that youth subjected to conversion practices are at risk of depression, anxiety, drug use, homelessness, and even suicidal thoughts. National mental health associations recommend prohibiting the practice due to its fundamentally homophobic assumptions about diverse sexual orientations and gender identities.
Twenty-three US states have already banned conversion therapy for minors. The Movement Advancement Project reports these efforts as a necessary step to protect vulnerable young people from this toxic practice.
However, the Trump administration appears determined to revive conversion therapy, with a Department of Health and Human Services report suggesting that it might be effective in changing an individual's sexual orientation.
Critics argue that this stance ignores decades of scientific research demonstrating that conversion therapy is not only ineffective but also damaging. As former patients themselves attest, being subjected to such treatment can have lasting effects on mental health and well-being.
The US Supreme Court's decision will not only impact the lives of LGBTQ+ individuals but also set a precedent for future challenges to civil rights protections. The outcome raises concerns about how far this administration is willing to go in its assault on marginalized communities, including immigrants, women, disabled individuals, African Americans, and more.
As Ben Franklin once said, "We must all hang together or we will all hang separately." In the face of such hostility, it's crucial for communities to come together to resist these attacks and advocate for justice, equality, and human rights.