A Texas jury began deliberations in the trial of Adrian Gonzales, the former Uvalde police officer accused of failing to confront the school shooter at Robb Elementary School. The trial is centered on 29 counts of child endangerment or abandonment related to Gonzales' actions during the mass shooting that killed 19 children and two teachers.
Prosecutors presented a case that Gonzales had knowledge of the gunman's movement and heard gunshots but failed to take action, leading to a delayed response by police. The special prosecutor argued that Gonzales had a duty to act in order to protect the children and had chosen not to do so, citing his actions as a failure.
Defense attorney Jason Goss countered that if taking immediate action is expected of law enforcement officers, then any mistake or misstep could lead to charges being brought against them. He stated that Gonzales did act by racing to the scene, entering the school hallway and taking fire from the gunman, contradicting prosecutors' claims that he simply stood by.
The trial has been marked by emotional outbursts in the courtroom, including a confrontation between Velma Duran, whose sister was killed at the school, and defense attorneys. Duran shouted from the gallery about policies and procedures surrounding active shooter situations, referencing the "fatal funnel" where officers can be shot.
As the jury begins deliberations, they must weigh the competing claims of the prosecution and defense, considering the responsibilities of police officers in such situations. The outcome will have significant implications for law enforcement practices and accountability in cases of mass shootings like the one at Robb Elementary School.
Prosecutors presented a case that Gonzales had knowledge of the gunman's movement and heard gunshots but failed to take action, leading to a delayed response by police. The special prosecutor argued that Gonzales had a duty to act in order to protect the children and had chosen not to do so, citing his actions as a failure.
Defense attorney Jason Goss countered that if taking immediate action is expected of law enforcement officers, then any mistake or misstep could lead to charges being brought against them. He stated that Gonzales did act by racing to the scene, entering the school hallway and taking fire from the gunman, contradicting prosecutors' claims that he simply stood by.
The trial has been marked by emotional outbursts in the courtroom, including a confrontation between Velma Duran, whose sister was killed at the school, and defense attorneys. Duran shouted from the gallery about policies and procedures surrounding active shooter situations, referencing the "fatal funnel" where officers can be shot.
As the jury begins deliberations, they must weigh the competing claims of the prosecution and defense, considering the responsibilities of police officers in such situations. The outcome will have significant implications for law enforcement practices and accountability in cases of mass shootings like the one at Robb Elementary School.
. I mean, this is a total tragedy, but what's even more messed up is that his defense team is trying to spin it like he did everything right by rushing into the school hallway and getting shot 
. Like, no, dude, you were supposed to protect those kids not put yourself in harm's way! 
And don't even get me started on the emotional outbursts in court... poor Velma Duran is still grieving her sister who got killed by that monster 
. This trial is gonna be super intense and I'm low-key worried about how it's all gonna play out 
.
like is it really that hard to keep kids safe? 
anyway i think its kinda ironic that the whole thing happened 'cause of an active shooter policy... sounds like the old saying "you can't teach an old dog new tricks"... but seriously, who sets up a "fatal funnel"? 
. It's crazy that Velma Duran, whose sister was killed, got to speak out about the policies that led to her sister's death. That's some justice right there! And it's interesting to hear from the defense side that they're pushing back against the idea that cops are always supposed to act in a certain way. I mean, shouldn't they be able to make decisions on the fly? It's not like we have all the answers, you know?
, but maybe this trial can help us figure out a way to prevent them.
. It's like, we need to support our first responders and help them feel seen and heard so they don't make mistakes like that again 
. And also, we gotta think about the policies and procedures... I remember hearing about the "fatal funnel" and it sounds crazy 
.
it's like, our minds are all fresh and stuff, trying to get ready for the week, but instead we're faced with this tragedy 
i mean, don't even get me started on the emotional toll it takes on the families and teachers... anyway, back to the trial... i feel bad for adrian gonzales, he's just a human being who made a mistake (hopefully) 
that's what i'd really love to see some answers on...
. The defense is right that any mistake could lead to charges being brought against them, so we need to consider the complexity of these situations.
. Her outbursts are understandable, and it's clear she wants answers. I hope the jury can find a way to balance justice with compassion and not just focus on blame 
. The police policies need to be reviewed, but let's not forget that our first responders put themselves at risk every day 
.
and we gotta wonder wut wouldve happened if that cop had acted faster 