The U.S. government is facing a lawsuit from the families of two Trinidadian men who were killed in a naval strike on October 14, 2025. Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, were among six civilians who lost their lives in the attack. The lawsuit claims that the U.S. government's actions were "manifestly unlawful" and amount to extrajudicial killings.
The lawsuit is being brought under the Death on the High Seas Act, which covers wrongful maritime deaths, as well as the Alien Tort Statute, which provides for claims of violations of international law. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for their loved ones' wrongful deaths.
According to experts, the U.S. military's campaign of attacks in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean is "unprecedented" and violates international laws prohibiting extrajudicial killings. The strikes have resulted in at least 126 civilian deaths, with many more injured or missing.
The lawsuit alleges that President Trump ordered a lethal kinetic strike on the boat where Joseph and Samaroo were killed, despite no evidence of any wrongdoing by the two men. The Trump administration has claimed that the attacks are permitted under international law, but experts disagree.
"This is not hyperbole," said Steven Watt, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Human Rights Program. "We're seeing a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government... It's an unprecedented attack on democracy."
The Intercept has reported extensively on the Trump administration's use of military force in the Caribbean and Pacific, including attacks on boats that were not involved in any armed conflict.
As the investigation continues, the families of Joseph and Samaroo are seeking answers about what happened to their loved ones. "Chad was a loving and caring son who was always there for me, for his wife and children," said Lenore Burnley, Joseph's mother. "I miss him terribly. We all do."
The lawsuit has sparked outrage among human rights groups and democracy advocates, who see it as a crucial test of the U.S. government's commitment to upholding international law.
"We're fighting back," said Jonathan Hafetz, a Seton Hall Law School professor. "But we need your help. Will you support The Intercept's reporting on this critical issue?"
The lawsuit is just one of many challenges facing the Trump administration in its attempts to use military force in the Caribbean and Pacific. As the investigation continues, one thing is clear: the U.S. government's actions will be closely watched by human rights groups and democracy advocates around the world.
In a statement, the Justice Department said it would not comment on the lawsuit. However, experts say that the lawsuit highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the use of military force.
"This allows the families of victims to bring a claim for wrongful or negligent death committed on the high seas," said Watt. "And in our case, this is murder."
The lawsuit is being brought under the Death on the High Seas Act, which covers wrongful maritime deaths, as well as the Alien Tort Statute, which provides for claims of violations of international law. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for their loved ones' wrongful deaths.
According to experts, the U.S. military's campaign of attacks in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean is "unprecedented" and violates international laws prohibiting extrajudicial killings. The strikes have resulted in at least 126 civilian deaths, with many more injured or missing.
The lawsuit alleges that President Trump ordered a lethal kinetic strike on the boat where Joseph and Samaroo were killed, despite no evidence of any wrongdoing by the two men. The Trump administration has claimed that the attacks are permitted under international law, but experts disagree.
"This is not hyperbole," said Steven Watt, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Human Rights Program. "We're seeing a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government... It's an unprecedented attack on democracy."
The Intercept has reported extensively on the Trump administration's use of military force in the Caribbean and Pacific, including attacks on boats that were not involved in any armed conflict.
As the investigation continues, the families of Joseph and Samaroo are seeking answers about what happened to their loved ones. "Chad was a loving and caring son who was always there for me, for his wife and children," said Lenore Burnley, Joseph's mother. "I miss him terribly. We all do."
The lawsuit has sparked outrage among human rights groups and democracy advocates, who see it as a crucial test of the U.S. government's commitment to upholding international law.
"We're fighting back," said Jonathan Hafetz, a Seton Hall Law School professor. "But we need your help. Will you support The Intercept's reporting on this critical issue?"
The lawsuit is just one of many challenges facing the Trump administration in its attempts to use military force in the Caribbean and Pacific. As the investigation continues, one thing is clear: the U.S. government's actions will be closely watched by human rights groups and democracy advocates around the world.
In a statement, the Justice Department said it would not comment on the lawsuit. However, experts say that the lawsuit highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the use of military force.
"This allows the families of victims to bring a claim for wrongful or negligent death committed on the high seas," said Watt. "And in our case, this is murder."