New York Governor Kathy Hochul has sidestepped a potential fight with fellow Democrats over reform of the state's youth criminal justice law in her latest budget proposal. The move, which maintains key elements of the landmark "Raise the Age" law that increased the age of criminal responsibility from 16 to 18, comes after sustained lobbying from prosecutors, police, and law enforcement groups who had hinted at revising the law.
Critics argue that the law's provisions have been largely ineffective in addressing rising youth crime rates, with advocates pointing to data showing a decline in overall youth crime since its passage. The issue also remains a contentious one within the state Democratic Party, with some lawmakers having signaled their support for maintaining the law as it stands.
Hochul's decision not to pursue changes to Raise the Age appears to have been driven by concerns about the potential backlash from progressives and the need to avoid reopening old wounds ahead of this year's re-election race. However, some critics, including Rensselaer County District Attorney Mary Pat Donnelly, who is also president of the New York District Attorneys Association, argue that necessary reform efforts have been sidestepped.
The group says it will continue to push for targeted revisions to the law, including moving more juvenile gun possession cases back into criminal court and giving prosecutors greater access to sealed family court case records. Advocates emphasize that community-based programs, counseling, and wraparound services are essential in addressing underlying issues driving youth crime, with funding for these initiatives remaining woefully inadequate.
The controversy surrounding Raise the Age has been ongoing since 2017, when New York was one of only two states automatically charging 16- and 17-year-olds as adults. The law passed following the high-profile case of Kalief Browder, who spent three years at Rikers Island awaiting trial for a minor charge before taking his own life.
As the state's Democratic majorities prepare to face another re-election test, advocates are warning that without sustained efforts to address underlying issues driving youth crime and implement evidence-based reforms, they may be forced to revisit these contentious issues in the future.
Critics argue that the law's provisions have been largely ineffective in addressing rising youth crime rates, with advocates pointing to data showing a decline in overall youth crime since its passage. The issue also remains a contentious one within the state Democratic Party, with some lawmakers having signaled their support for maintaining the law as it stands.
Hochul's decision not to pursue changes to Raise the Age appears to have been driven by concerns about the potential backlash from progressives and the need to avoid reopening old wounds ahead of this year's re-election race. However, some critics, including Rensselaer County District Attorney Mary Pat Donnelly, who is also president of the New York District Attorneys Association, argue that necessary reform efforts have been sidestepped.
The group says it will continue to push for targeted revisions to the law, including moving more juvenile gun possession cases back into criminal court and giving prosecutors greater access to sealed family court case records. Advocates emphasize that community-based programs, counseling, and wraparound services are essential in addressing underlying issues driving youth crime, with funding for these initiatives remaining woefully inadequate.
The controversy surrounding Raise the Age has been ongoing since 2017, when New York was one of only two states automatically charging 16- and 17-year-olds as adults. The law passed following the high-profile case of Kalief Browder, who spent three years at Rikers Island awaiting trial for a minor charge before taking his own life.
As the state's Democratic majorities prepare to face another re-election test, advocates are warning that without sustained efforts to address underlying issues driving youth crime and implement evidence-based reforms, they may be forced to revisit these contentious issues in the future.