A cluster of tents had sprung up on the University of Houston's central lawn, amidst tensions with administrators that were already running high. Pro-Palestine chalk messages and similar incidents had set off alarms among university leaders. But what students didn't know at the time was that their own university had contracted with Dataminr, an artificial intelligence company with a troubling record on constitutional rights, to gather open-source intelligence on student-led protests for Palestine.
Using an AI tool known as "First Alert," Datminr scraped students' social media activity and chat logs, sending what it learned back to the university administration. The university's communications officials forwarded the alerts directly to campus police, treating the tents on their lawn as an unsafe environment.
The use of Datminr and First Alert is just one example of how U.S. public universities have worked with private partners to surveil student protests and crack down on free expression. Corporate involvement in higher education has been leveraged against students' rights, according to an investigative series by The Intercept.
More than 20,000 pages of documentation reveal a systematic pattern of surveillance by U.S. universities in response to student dissent. Public universities tapped emergency response funds for natural disasters to quell protests; in Ohio and South Carolina, schools received briefings from intelligence-sharing fusion centers; at the University of Connecticut, student participation in a protest sent administrators into a frenzy over what a local military weapons manufacturer would think.
The series also shows how U.S. universities used open-source intelligence to monitor student-led movements for Palestine, tracing back the development as part of the broader corporatization of U.S. higher education. "Institutions that are supposed to be for the public good are these corporate products that make them into vehicles for wealth extraction via data products," said Emily Tucker, executive director of the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown Law.
Universities have become more like for-profit branding machines, and digital capitalism is exploding.
Students who took part in protests against Israel's policies reported being intimidated by surveillance, using burner phones and limiting communication about potential demonstrations to secure messaging channels.
The surveillance has had a "chilling effect," according to one student at the University of Virginia, Kirk Wolff. "I had so many people tell me that they wanted to join me, that they agreed with me, but they simply couldn't, because they were scared that the school would turn over their information."
As Trump returned to power and dragged the crackdown on pro-Palestine dissent into the open, universities have shared employee and student files with the Trump administration as it investigates "anti-Semitic incidents on campus." The Intercept reported in April that the Los Angeles Police Department used First Alert to monitor pro-Palestine demonstrations in LA.
Using an AI tool known as "First Alert," Datminr scraped students' social media activity and chat logs, sending what it learned back to the university administration. The university's communications officials forwarded the alerts directly to campus police, treating the tents on their lawn as an unsafe environment.
The use of Datminr and First Alert is just one example of how U.S. public universities have worked with private partners to surveil student protests and crack down on free expression. Corporate involvement in higher education has been leveraged against students' rights, according to an investigative series by The Intercept.
More than 20,000 pages of documentation reveal a systematic pattern of surveillance by U.S. universities in response to student dissent. Public universities tapped emergency response funds for natural disasters to quell protests; in Ohio and South Carolina, schools received briefings from intelligence-sharing fusion centers; at the University of Connecticut, student participation in a protest sent administrators into a frenzy over what a local military weapons manufacturer would think.
The series also shows how U.S. universities used open-source intelligence to monitor student-led movements for Palestine, tracing back the development as part of the broader corporatization of U.S. higher education. "Institutions that are supposed to be for the public good are these corporate products that make them into vehicles for wealth extraction via data products," said Emily Tucker, executive director of the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown Law.
Universities have become more like for-profit branding machines, and digital capitalism is exploding.
Students who took part in protests against Israel's policies reported being intimidated by surveillance, using burner phones and limiting communication about potential demonstrations to secure messaging channels.
The surveillance has had a "chilling effect," according to one student at the University of Virginia, Kirk Wolff. "I had so many people tell me that they wanted to join me, that they agreed with me, but they simply couldn't, because they were scared that the school would turn over their information."
As Trump returned to power and dragged the crackdown on pro-Palestine dissent into the open, universities have shared employee and student files with the Trump administration as it investigates "anti-Semitic incidents on campus." The Intercept reported in April that the Los Angeles Police Department used First Alert to monitor pro-Palestine demonstrations in LA.