Matt Damon is right: phones + Netflix mean we are now in the pub bore age of cinema

The film industry has indeed reached a point where the traditional experience of watching movies in theaters is being slowly eroded by the rise of streaming services like Netflix. According to Matt Damon, the latest film released on Netflix, "The Rip," starring Ben Affleck alongside him, highlights the difficulties of creating engaging content for this new era.

Damon lamented that when you're making a movie specifically designed to be watched on TV or streaming platforms, it means sacrificing the ability to create a truly immersive experience. Unlike going to see a film in theaters, where you turn up at an appointed time and are fully present, watching Netflix can mean multiple distractions - lights on, kids running around, phones glued to screens.

This new reality has also led to a watering down of storytelling techniques. Damon noted that streaming services often advise filmmakers to dumb things down and repeat key plot points in dialogue just to ensure viewers stay engaged when they're busy scrolling through their phones or multitasking. This, he believes, is a recipe for a "pub bore age" of cinema - dull, uninspired stories told at a snail's pace.

However, it's worth considering that Netflix does possess an unprecedented amount of data on viewer behavior and preferences. By leveraging this granular information, the platform can refine its approach to storytelling, tailoring content to meet the needs and attention spans of its audience.

But there's another factor at play here: Damon's own career trajectory. As a star of Christopher Nolan's upcoming epic, "The Odyssey," he's about to take part in one of the most highly anticipated releases of the year. Given his newfound platform and box office draw, it's reasonable to expect that his opinions on Netflix might carry more weight - if only because they could potentially impact the financial prospects of a rival streaming service.

Ultimately, as with most things in life, there are valid points to be made on both sides of this argument. While Netflix may have a compelling reason for advocating a slower, more explanatory narrative style, Damon's concerns about artistic compromise and audience attention span cannot be dismissed outright.
 
I think the film industry is at a bit of an impasse here πŸ€”... On one hand, you've got these streaming services like Netflix that have changed the way we consume movies forever πŸ’». They're giving us more options than ever before and making cinema more accessible to people who might not have been able to afford tickets in the past.

But on the other hand, as Matt Damon points out, this convenience comes at a cost πŸŽ₯. When you're watching a movie on Netflix, it's easy to get distracted by your surroundings - family members running around, lights turned up, phones buzzing... it's just not the same as being in a darkened theater with no distractions 🍿.

And yeah, I think there is something to be said for the "pub bore age" of cinema that Damon's talking about 😴. When stories are told at a snail's pace and key plot points are repeated in dialogue just to keep viewers engaged, it can feel like you're being talked down to rather than being entertained.

But I also think Netflix has a valid point when they say they've got the data to back up their approach πŸ“Š. By understanding what people watch and how they engage with content, they can create shows and movies that are tailored specifically to those audiences... it's just about striking a balance between accessibility and artistic merit.

Ultimately, I think the key is for filmmakers like Matt Damon to continue pushing the boundaries of storytelling while also being mindful of the changing landscape of cinema 🌊. It won't be easy, but if anyone can make it work, he probably can 😎
 
OMG 🀯... I'm like totally seeing some shady stuff going down here πŸ€‘. Matt Damon is totes trying to promote his own flick, "The Odyssey", and get the masses on his side πŸŽ₯. He's basically saying Netflix is killing art by dumbing down stories, but what if it's just a clever ploy to make their own movie sound more appealing? Like, what if they're actually onto something with this whole data-driven storytelling thing? πŸ€” But at the same time, I'm not buying the "pub bore age" narrative πŸ˜’. It sounds like Hollywood is just trying to cover its own behinds and maintain control over the narrative 🎬. This is all about the Benjamins, folks πŸ’Έ...
 
omg i feel like ben affleck is totally right about the whole streaming thing πŸ€”... it's so hard to create content that'll keep people engaged when they're constantly distracted πŸ˜‚... but on the other hand, nnetflix has got some serious data on what people watch and when, so maybe they can find a way to make it work? πŸ“Š... personally i think it's all about finding a balance between storytelling and making it easy for people to consume - like, don't dumb down your script just because it's gonna be on netflix, but also try not to make it too confusing πŸ˜…... and what about the rise of streaming services in general? is that a good thing or bad thing for cinema as a whole? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I'm so done with how streaming services are changing the way we consume movies πŸ€―β€β™‚οΈ. Like, I get it, Netflix has all this data on viewer behavior, but can't they just make content that's actually engaging? Instead of dumbing down storytelling techniques and repeating key plot points, couldn't they try to make more complex stories with some depth? And don't even get me started on how distracted I am when watching a movie at home πŸ“ΊπŸ˜΄. Can't we just have a peaceful viewing experience for once?

I mean, I'm all for innovation, but this "pub bore age" of cinema thing is just a cop-out πŸ™„. Give me a break. Theaters are where it's at – you can't replicate that immersive experience with just a screen and some comfy couches πŸΏπŸ›‹οΈ. And let's not forget about the careers of people like Ben Affleck, who are actually putting their behinds on the line to make art that might get lost in the sea of streaming content πŸŽ₯πŸ˜“.

I guess what I'm saying is, can't we find a way to balance artistic expression with the needs of our audience? Maybe Netflix has some insights, but it's not like they're the only game in town πŸ€”.
 
I feel like watching movies on Netflix is just not the same as going to the cinema 🍿😐 I mean, it's so easy to get distracted at home with the kids running around or having a phone nearby... it's just not an immersive experience, you know? πŸ’» And yeah, I can see how streaming services are trying to dumb things down so people stay engaged while they're scrolling through their feeds 🀯

But on the other hand, I think Netflix has got a lot of data on what people like and don't like, so maybe they can use that to make better content πŸ“Š? And who knows, maybe we just need to get used to watching movies in a different way... but it's hard for me to imagine anything being as exciting as going to the cinema with all my friends πŸŽ₯πŸ‘«
 
I gotta say, I'm low-key disappointed that movies are losing that theatre magic πŸŽ₯‍♂️. When you watch something on Netflix, it's like, you're browsing through a never-ending YouTube playlist 😴. I mean, don't get me wrong, streaming is convenient and all, but can't we get back to that cinema experience where we're fully invested in the story? 🎬 It's not just about the visuals, either – I feel like shows are getting too formulaic lately. And yeah, Netflix has a ton of data on what people watch, so it's cool they're trying to tailor their content... but can't we still have some artistic freedom, you know? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ The whole pub bore age thing is pretty accurate – I'm all for storytelling that keeps me engaged, not just phoning it in πŸ“Ί.
 
πŸ€” what do you think is the real issue here? is it really about creating engaging content or is it just a case of having too many options and not enough accountability? i mean, don't get me wrong, streaming services have changed the game, but can't we also acknowledge that some people are just gonna watch whatever they want when & wherever they want πŸ“ΊπŸ•°οΈ.
 
I think Matt Damon's got some legit points about the state of cinema with streaming services πŸ€”. I mean, watching movies on Netflix can be super different from seeing them in theaters. It's like he said, there are a lot more distractions when you're watching at home - family members, phones, the TV is always on... it kinda takes away from the experience, ya know?

But, like Damon says, Netflix does have an edge with all that data they've got on viewer behavior πŸ“Š. If they can use that to create content that's actually engaging and doesn't feel like it's talking down to you, then maybe we'll see some real changes in the way movies are made.

And, let's be real, the whole "pub bore age" thing kinda hits home too 😴. I mean, I've seen movies on Netflix that just felt like they were phoning it in, repeating themselves for no reason other than to keep you from checking your phone... it's not exactly the most thrilling experience.

But, I do think Damon's got a point about artistic compromise too 🎨. Maybe we're sacrificing some depth and complexity because of the way streaming services are telling us what kind of content to make.
 
I'm totally feeling the vibes from Matt Damon here! 🀯 I mean, can you blame him for wanting to create an immersive experience when people are watching on their phones with lights on? It's like, what's the point of even having a movie theater if we're just gonna watch it on our tiny screens at home? πŸ˜‚ And yeah, I think streamers do have a lot of data on viewer behavior - but does that mean they should be dumbing down stories just to make 'em more engaging? πŸ€” It's like, don't get me wrong, Netflix has some amazing shows and movies... but sometimes I feel like they're sacrificing quality for the sake of quantity. And let's be real, who doesn't love a good epic film that's gonna blow their minds?! 😲 Like Christopher Nolan's "The Odyssey" - can't wait to see it! πŸŽ₯
 
I'm kinda torn on this one πŸ€”. On one hand, I think Netflix has the power to create some incredible content that we might not get in theaters because of budget or time constraints. But at the same time, it's true that watching a movie at home can be super distracting and affects the overall experience.

And I mean, Matt Damon's right about how they're trying to dumb things down just to keep people engaged. Like, when you watch a good TV show on Netflix, you don't need it to explain every little detail in a dialogue πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. But at the same time, it's cool that they have all this data on viewer behavior and can use it to create better content.

I also think about how movie theaters are still an experience, you know? You go with friends, you get popcorn, it's a whole thing 😊. I'm not sure if Netflix will ever be able to replicate that magic πŸŽ₯πŸ’«.
 
Back
Top