Lawmakers Reach Settlement in Michigan Disaster Cleanup Worker COVID Lawsuit
A group of workers who were employed to perform disaster cleanup work during the early stages of the pandemic have reached a confidential settlement with their former employers. The agreement, announced by the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, resolves allegations that the companies failed to provide adequate protections against COVID-19.
In May 2020, two major dams in Midland County, Michigan burst, causing widespread flooding that affected many areas of the region. As a result, numerous workers were recruited from across the state to clean up and remediate damage at various sites. However, it was discovered that these workers were housed in cramped conditions, forced to share beds with multiple people, and transported in crowded vans.
According to reports filed by the workers, their employers did not adhere to basic COVID-19 protocols, which included establishing a preparedness plan, providing proper training, screening, and protective equipment. Furthermore, when some workers began experiencing symptoms of the virus, public health officials were informed that they should remain at the site to isolate or quarantine; however, this critical information was not effectively communicated to the employees.
This has led to severe cases of COVID-19 among the affected workers, including hospitalizations requiring ventilator support. The lawsuit also alleged that some workers contracted the illness and became severely ill after being sent back out of state while in isolation.
As a result of the settlement, John Philo, executive director of the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, stated that the agreement sends an important message to industry leaders: worker safety must be prioritized. "This outcome represents a major step forward for resilience workers who are often placed in hazardous environments with limited power to speak up," Philo said.
Saket Soni, executive director of Resilience Force, another organization representing the affected workers, also expressed hope that this settlement will lead to broader industry-wide changes aimed at protecting disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies. "We hope this outcome drives meaningful change to protect disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies," Soni said.
A group of workers who were employed to perform disaster cleanup work during the early stages of the pandemic have reached a confidential settlement with their former employers. The agreement, announced by the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, resolves allegations that the companies failed to provide adequate protections against COVID-19.
In May 2020, two major dams in Midland County, Michigan burst, causing widespread flooding that affected many areas of the region. As a result, numerous workers were recruited from across the state to clean up and remediate damage at various sites. However, it was discovered that these workers were housed in cramped conditions, forced to share beds with multiple people, and transported in crowded vans.
According to reports filed by the workers, their employers did not adhere to basic COVID-19 protocols, which included establishing a preparedness plan, providing proper training, screening, and protective equipment. Furthermore, when some workers began experiencing symptoms of the virus, public health officials were informed that they should remain at the site to isolate or quarantine; however, this critical information was not effectively communicated to the employees.
This has led to severe cases of COVID-19 among the affected workers, including hospitalizations requiring ventilator support. The lawsuit also alleged that some workers contracted the illness and became severely ill after being sent back out of state while in isolation.
As a result of the settlement, John Philo, executive director of the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, stated that the agreement sends an important message to industry leaders: worker safety must be prioritized. "This outcome represents a major step forward for resilience workers who are often placed in hazardous environments with limited power to speak up," Philo said.
Saket Soni, executive director of Resilience Force, another organization representing the affected workers, also expressed hope that this settlement will lead to broader industry-wide changes aimed at protecting disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies. "We hope this outcome drives meaningful change to protect disaster-recovery workers in future emergencies," Soni said.