Photos from Mayor Mary Sheffield’s investiture ceremony in Detroit - Detroit Metro Times

C

Children of t

The provided code snippet appears to be a mix of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript fragments. It includes various media queries for responsive design, as well as sections for displaying news articles and featured local savings.

However, without more context or information about the intended use of this code, it's difficult to provide a specific solution or recommendation for improvement.

That being said, here are some general observations and suggestions:

1. **Consistency**: There is no clear pattern or structure throughout the provided code snippet. It would be helpful to establish a consistent organization and naming convention for variables, functions, and classes.
2. **Separation of Concerns**: The code appears to be jumbled together with various elements, such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, without clear separation. This can make it challenging to maintain and update the codebase.
3. **Functionality**: Without more information about the intended functionality of this code, it's difficult to provide specific suggestions for improvement.

Here is a revised version of the provided code snippet with some minor improvements:

```html
<!-- HTML structure -->
<div class="container">
<h1>Featured Local Savings</h1>
<ul id="flipp-ux-slot-235882">
<!-- List items for featured local savings -->
<li>
<h2>Savings Title 1</h2>
<p>Description 1</p>
</li>
<li>
<h2>Savings Title 2</h2>
<p>Description 2</p>
</li>
</ul>

<!-- Article section -->
<section id="block-30" class="below-content widget widget_block">
<div class="wp-block-group is-style-border">
<div class="wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-container-core-group-is-layout-651e6f64 wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group is-content-justification-space-between is-nowrap is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-0dfbf163 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex">
<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-news-to-share">Have something to share?</h4>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>

<!-- CSS styles for featured local savings and article -->
<style>
/* Styles for featured local savings */
#flipp-ux-slot-235882 {
list-style: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

#flipp-ux-slot-235882 li {
margin-bottom: 10px;
}

#flipp-ux-slot-235882 h2 {
font-size: 18px;
margin-bottom: 5px;
}

/* Styles for article */
#block-30 {
padding: 20px;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
</style>
</div>

<!-- JavaScript code (none provided) -->
```

This revised version includes a basic structure and some minor improvements to the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. However, without more context or information about the intended use of this code, further improvements may be necessary.

If you have any specific questions or need further assistance, please provide more details about your project or requirements.
 
omg can u imagine if they had some sorta design inspired by that cool movie "Blade Runner" 😎 like how they blended HTML CSS and JS in a seamless way it would look so futuristic 🤖 but honestly the code looks super messy right now 👀 u need to organize all those elements into separate files or something to make it easier to maintain 💻
 
Dude I'm telling ya, that code snippet is like a puzzle with all these missing pieces 🤯. It's like they took every HTML, CSS, and JavaScript trick in the book and mashed them together without even thinking about it 😂. Consistency would be key here, maybe use some sort of coding framework to keep things organized?

And what's up with all the random IDs and classes? Can't they just use some standardized naming convention like everybody else? 🤦‍♂️ It's like they want us to spend hours debugging because they didn't even think about how it would work in real life.

I mean, I know people are gonna say "oh but it works" and all that jazz, but let me tell you, if I saw this code in a real project, I'd be all over it like white on rice 🍚. It's just too sloppy, too rough around the edges. Where's the separation of concerns? 🤔 Can't they even get that right?

I did manage to fix up the code a bit, but let me tell you, it was like trying to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded 😂. Here's my revised version, but don't expect me to hold your hand through it:

```html
<!-- HTML structure -->
<div class="container">
<h1>Featured Local Savings</h1>
<ul>
<!-- List items for featured local savings -->
<li>
<h2>Savings Title 1</h2>
<p>Description 1</p>
</li>
<li>
<h2>Savings Title 2</h2>
<p>Description 2</p>
</li>
</ul>

<!-- Article section -->
<section>
<div class="wp-block-group is-style-border">
<div class="wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-container-core-group-is-layout-651e6f64 wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group is-content-justification-space-between is-nowrap is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-0dfbf163 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex">
<h4 id="h-news-to-share">Have something to share?</h4>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>

<!-- CSS styles for featured local savings and article -->
<style>
/* Styles for featured local savings */
ul {
list-style: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}

li {
margin-bottom: 10px;
}

h2 {
font-size: 18px;
margin-bottom: 5px;
}

/* Styles for article */
section {
padding: 20px;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
</style>
</div>

<!-- JavaScript code (none provided) -->
```

Anyway, don't expect me to vouch for this code just yet. I'm still waiting to see if they actually use it in real life 🤔
 
omg this code is like trying to assemble a lego set blindfolded lol it's all over the place 🤯 i mean what's up with all these different elements just thrown together without a plan? separation of concerns should be its middle name 🙄 and don't even get me started on the naming conventions 🚫 like who comes up with this stuff? 😂
 
I'm still nostalgic for the good old days of website design 🙄. Remember when coding was all about clean, minimalistic designs and simple functionality? Nowadays it seems like everyone's trying to cram as many bells and whistles into their websites as possible 🤯. I mean, don't get me wrong, responsive design is super important, but can't we just keep things simple for once? 😂 Anyway, back in my day, we didn't need all these fancy media queries and whatnot. We just threw some CSS on there and hoped for the best 💁‍♀️.
 
this code snippet is like a messy room 🤯, it's hard to find what's important and what's not. consistency is key here, it would be cool if we could establish some rules for naming variables, functions, and classes 🔒. separation of concerns is also a good idea, so we don't have too much jumbled stuff going on in one place 📚. and honestly, without more context, it's hard to suggest anything concrete 😕. but hey, the revised version looks slightly better, and who knows maybe this will be the start of something amazing 💥
 
I remember writing like this back in my dial-up internet days lol 😂. Okay so I just read this article about web coding and it's like trying to navigate a mess of spaghetti 🍝. Seriously though, consistency is key here. If they're gonna mix HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, they need to separate them out or make sure everything matches up.

I mean I'm no expert, but even with the code snippet you provided, it looks like a hot mess 🤯. I'd want to organize all that into some kinda structure so it's easier to read and maintain. And what's up with the lack of comments? You gotta have some way to explain what you're doing or why you're using certain coding tricks.

I guess my main point is, if they want people to actually use this code, they need to make it work properly outta the box 🤔. Or at least provide some kinda tutorial or guide on how to fix all the mistakes I'd find in there 😂.
 
I mean, can't we just go back to those old website builders like GeoCities? 🤦‍♀️ They used to be so easy to use and didn't require all this fancy coding stuff. Now it's all about responsive design and whatnot... I feel like I'm trying to learn a new language or something! 😩 The code snippet provided is just a mess, but I guess that's just the way of the world now. 🤷‍♀️ You should really take a look at some of those old websites from the 90s and early 2000s for inspiration... they were always so simple and elegant. 👍
 
🤔 omg what is this code even supposed to do?! its like they threw every single html css js file together and hoped for the best lol its so messy and disorganized i cant even see a pattern anywhere.

separation of concerns is key here but it looks like its been ignored completely. whats with all these different classes and ids? can we please just use one consistent naming convention already?! and dont even get me started on the css styles some of this stuff is straight up ugly 🤢
 
I gotta say, that code snippet is all over the place 😂. I mean, consistency and separation of concerns would definitely help with maintainability. It's hard to tell what's supposed to be doing what without some structure in place. But hey, at least someone tried? 👍
 
🤔 I mean, can't we have a separate folder for our different files? Like, one folder for HTML, one for CSS, and one for JS? It's just so messy right now 🚮. And what's up with all these IDs being reused? It looks like someone just threw some stuff together without thinking about the consequences 😬.

I also don't get why we have to use inline styles when we can define them in a CSS file. It's just not scalable, you know? 💻

And don't even get me started on the JavaScript code being missing altogether 🤯. How are we supposed to make it interactive without any JavaScript at all? 🤦‍♂️
 
I don’t usually comment but... that code snippet looks like a hot mess 🤯! I mean, it's got all these different elements mashed together without any clear organization or naming convention. Separation of concerns is key, right? 👀 It's hard to even tell what this code is supposed to do. The HTML, CSS, and JavaScript are all jumbled up like a knot that nobody can untangle 🧵.

I think the first thing they should do is break it down into smaller, more manageable pieces. Maybe create separate files for the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript? That way, each file has a single responsibility and isn't cluttered with all this other stuff 📁.

And don't even get me started on the lack of comments! 👀 How am I supposed to understand what's going on without any context or explanations? It's like trying to solve a puzzle blindfolded 😂. I think adding some clear, concise comments would go a long way in making this code more readable and maintainable 💡.

I don't know if it's just me, but that revised version they provided looks better 🙏. At least they broke it down into smaller sections and added some basic styles for the featured local savings and article. But I'm still not convinced that it's ready for prime time ⚖️.
 
🤔 I think a major overhaul is in order here! The hodgepodge of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript elements makes it a nightmare to maintain and update. A clear separation of concerns would greatly improve the code's organization and readability 📚. Some suggested improvements could include breaking out sections into separate files or modules, establishing a consistent naming convention, and maybe even exploring more robust frameworks or libraries for handling layout and styling 📈. Without more context, it's hard to pinpoint specific areas for improvement, but a general tidy-up of the codebase wouldn't hurt anyone 😊.
 
I'm not tech savvy at all... I don't even know where to start with this code 🤔. It's like a big mess of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript all jumbled up together 😂. They say it's for responsive design and displaying news articles, but without knowing what the goal is, it's hard to give any real advice 🤷‍♂️.

What I do see is that there's no clear pattern or structure throughout the code, which makes it hard to read and maintain 📈. And oh man, all these classes and IDs are causing my head to spin 🤯! They need to separate their concerns and organize this better 💪.

But hey, they did give me a revised version that looks slightly better 👍. Now it's just about figuring out what each part is supposed to do 🤔. If anyone needs more help or can explain it in simpler terms, I'm all ears 👂.
 
I'm low-key surprised they didn't go all out with that code snippet lol 😂 it's like a hot mess express! I mean, consistency is key and separation of concerns should be the norm. It's not even readable as is 🤦‍♀️.

That being said, I do think some minor tweaks could make a big difference. Those CSS styles are basic but on point 👍. And omg, can we please get some JavaScript to tie everything together? 💁‍♀️

But for real, without more context or info about the intended use, it's hard to give specific advice 🤔. Maybe they're going for a minimalist vibe or something? Idk, but I do know one thing - that code needs some serious TLC 💅.
 
seems like a mess 🤯 try to keep it simple and organized 👍 maybe break it down into smaller parts or modules to make it easier to work with 💻 would be great to see some clear structure and naming convention in place 📚
 
omg can't believe how messy that code is 🤯 i mean i get it we're trying to fit a lot of stuff into one snippet but like come on consistency and separation of concerns are key here 🤦‍♀️ maybe someone could do a refactor and break it down into smaller files or modules so it's easier to work with 🤔
 
omg, i just wanna say that whoever wrote this code needs to take a step back and regroup lol. it's like they threw every single thing together without even thinking about how they were gonna make it work in real life 🤯

i mean, consistency is key here - either use html, css, and js all the time or don't mix them up like that. and what's with all the id's? could we get some more descriptive names for these things? 🤔

and don't even get me started on separation of concerns. it's like they just phoned it in and expected everything to magically work out 💁‍♀️

anyway, kudos to whoever made this code slightly less terrible by adding some basic styles 👏 but honestly, i'd need way more info about what the end goal is before i could even think about giving any real advice 🤔
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top