Prominent PR firm accused of commissioning favourable changes to Wikipedia pages

🤔 I'm telling you, this is just the tip of the iceberg 🌊. First it's Wikipedia, now we're talking about PR firms messing with Downing Street? This is like a game of Whac-A-Mole, but instead of mallets, they're using influence and power to control the narrative. Tim Allan, the guy who worked for Keir Starmer, now he's at the center of all this... what's his real motive here? 🤑

And let's not forget about Qatar, manipulating their Wikipedia page to improve their image ahead of the World Cup? That's some serious corruption right there 💸. And now they're trying to spin it as a PR firm doing its job, but I'm calling foul on this one 👊.

This is what happens when you give too much power to those who want to shape public opinion without being held accountable 🤷‍♂️. The CIPR saying intentional deceit and anonymous activities are breaches of code... yeah right, until someone's willing to actually take them down 💪. Mark my words, this is just the beginning of a larger story 🔍.
 
just think about it, if a PR firm is messing with wikipedia pages, what's next? they'll be editing news articles too 📰😬 i mean, come on, who makes decisions on what gets edited and what doesn't? shouldnt there be some kind of oversight or accountability? its like they're trying to control the narrative and shape public opinion. thats not how journalism works, or so we thought 😒
 
🤔 this is getting out of hand, PR firms should be about building trust not manipulating info 📰😬 3rd party contractors making changes on Wikipedia? sounds like a recipe for disaster 🚨
 
🤔 I'm not surprised to hear about this wikilaundering scandal, tbh. PR firms have been trying to manipulate public perception for ages, but it's pretty shady when they do it on a platform like Wikipedia 🙅‍♂️. If they're paying people to edit pages and bury negative info, that's just not right. I mean, what's the point of having objective information if you can just pay someone to change it? 💸 The fact that some former employees came forward to confirm their colleagues were doing this is even more worrying. It raises so many questions about accountability and transparency... 👀
 
this is so messed up 🤯, a PR firm basically using wikipedia like their own personal propaganda machine... i mean what's next? buying influence on youtube or something? 😒 it's not like they're hiding it either, like some of these edits are literally just buried under "see also" sections... it's just a clear case of trying to manipulate public opinion for the sake of $$$ 💸
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top