A Growing Crack in the Republican Ranks as Trump's Greenland Gambit Falters
The US president's long-held ambitions to seize control of Greenland have sparked a rare display of dissent among congressional Republicans, with several high-ranking lawmakers now openly warning against pursuing the idea. The pushback comes as polling suggests that a majority of Americans strongly oppose the notion, and Denmark has warned that any invasion would spell disaster for Nato.
North Carolina senator Thom Tillis and Nebraska congressman Don Bacon are just two of the senior Republicans who have joined forces to sound the alarm. "The thought of the US taking the position that we would take Greenland is absurd," Tillis said in a Senate floor speech, citing the island's long-standing pro-American history. Bacon, meanwhile, threatened that if Trump presses ahead with his threats, he could face a major backfire - and even lose his re-election bid.
The concerns are compounded by warnings from former Senate leader Mitch McConnell, who has likened the prospect of US control to Joe Biden's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. "Following through on this provocation would be more disastrous for the president's legacy than withdrawing from Afghanistan was," McConnell said. The potential consequences, he added, include incinerating the trust of loyal allies and alienating key partners in a bid for no tangible benefits.
Trump has maintained an expansionist streak since taking office, including public declarations of support for annexing Canada and the Panama canal - despite Greenland being part of Denmark, a Nato ally. The issue had seemingly faded from the agenda as Trump grappled with sagging approval ratings but has resurfaced following the successful raid in Venezuela that saw Maduro taken into custody.
European countries have swiftly denounced Trump's comments, while troops from several key nations have converged on Greenland to demonstrate their support and assess what a sustained deployment might entail. The foreign ministers of Greenland and Denmark met with Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, but the meeting failed to sway the president's stance.
Trump has insisted that the US still needs Greenland for national security reasons, and even warned of imposing tariffs on countries opposing his campaign. However, as several high-ranking Republicans now openly question his strategy, it remains to be seen whether Trump can muster enough support within his own party to push forward with his plans.
A growing number of lawmakers are taking a firmer stance against the president's ambitions - not just those who have already broken ranks but also some close allies. Senator Lisa Murkowski has expressed concerns that Greenland should be viewed as an ally, not an asset, while Ohio congressman Mike Turner emphasized the importance of respecting sovereignty and maintaining transatlantic relationships.
Even senior Republicans like Louisiana senator John Kennedy are now speaking out against Trump's plans, with Kennedy labeling any invasion "weapons-grade stupid." The prospect of a major internal rift in the Republican ranks raises questions about whether Trump can successfully navigate this crisis - or if it might ultimately prove his undoing.
The US president's long-held ambitions to seize control of Greenland have sparked a rare display of dissent among congressional Republicans, with several high-ranking lawmakers now openly warning against pursuing the idea. The pushback comes as polling suggests that a majority of Americans strongly oppose the notion, and Denmark has warned that any invasion would spell disaster for Nato.
North Carolina senator Thom Tillis and Nebraska congressman Don Bacon are just two of the senior Republicans who have joined forces to sound the alarm. "The thought of the US taking the position that we would take Greenland is absurd," Tillis said in a Senate floor speech, citing the island's long-standing pro-American history. Bacon, meanwhile, threatened that if Trump presses ahead with his threats, he could face a major backfire - and even lose his re-election bid.
The concerns are compounded by warnings from former Senate leader Mitch McConnell, who has likened the prospect of US control to Joe Biden's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. "Following through on this provocation would be more disastrous for the president's legacy than withdrawing from Afghanistan was," McConnell said. The potential consequences, he added, include incinerating the trust of loyal allies and alienating key partners in a bid for no tangible benefits.
Trump has maintained an expansionist streak since taking office, including public declarations of support for annexing Canada and the Panama canal - despite Greenland being part of Denmark, a Nato ally. The issue had seemingly faded from the agenda as Trump grappled with sagging approval ratings but has resurfaced following the successful raid in Venezuela that saw Maduro taken into custody.
European countries have swiftly denounced Trump's comments, while troops from several key nations have converged on Greenland to demonstrate their support and assess what a sustained deployment might entail. The foreign ministers of Greenland and Denmark met with Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, but the meeting failed to sway the president's stance.
Trump has insisted that the US still needs Greenland for national security reasons, and even warned of imposing tariffs on countries opposing his campaign. However, as several high-ranking Republicans now openly question his strategy, it remains to be seen whether Trump can muster enough support within his own party to push forward with his plans.
A growing number of lawmakers are taking a firmer stance against the president's ambitions - not just those who have already broken ranks but also some close allies. Senator Lisa Murkowski has expressed concerns that Greenland should be viewed as an ally, not an asset, while Ohio congressman Mike Turner emphasized the importance of respecting sovereignty and maintaining transatlantic relationships.
Even senior Republicans like Louisiana senator John Kennedy are now speaking out against Trump's plans, with Kennedy labeling any invasion "weapons-grade stupid." The prospect of a major internal rift in the Republican ranks raises questions about whether Trump can successfully navigate this crisis - or if it might ultimately prove his undoing.