"Silent Hill Sequel Met with Scathing Reviews from Critics"
Christophe Gans' latest horror thriller, "Return to Silent Hill," has opened in theaters nationwide, but its reception has been overwhelmingly negative. Based on the 2001 video game "Silent Hill 2," the film follows James (Jeremy Irvine) as he receives a mysterious letter from his lost love Mary, leading him back to the haunted town of Silent Hill.
While audiences have given the film a slightly more positive response than critics, with a 32% "rotten" rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on over 100 verified user reviews, the majority of professional reviewers have panned it. The consensus among top critics is that the film lacks the same level of uncanniness and eeriness as its video game counterpart.
Beatrice Loayza from the New York Times gave the film a "rotten" score, stating that it feels like a "jumbled assembly of cutscenes" rather than a cohesive horror experience. Jesse Hassenger from The Guardian also criticized the film, arguing that making a horror movie with a hero who is more curious than scared is a difficult proposition.
Jacob Oller from The AV Club went even further, calling the film "goofy and low-rent," stating that it fails to leave a lasting impression on audiences. In contrast, Simon Abrams of RogerEbert.com gave the film a "fresh" review score, praising its ability to deliver more of the same as the original game.
Dominic Baez from The Seattle Times also awarded the film a "fresh" score, although he noted that it doesn't hold up to the standard set by the video game. He praised the film's stylish credits and its ability to justify the viewer's decisions once the credits roll.
Overall, it seems that "Return to Silent Hill" has failed to live up to expectations from critics and audiences alike, leaving many wondering if this sequel is truly worth revisiting the haunted world of Silent Hill.
Christophe Gans' latest horror thriller, "Return to Silent Hill," has opened in theaters nationwide, but its reception has been overwhelmingly negative. Based on the 2001 video game "Silent Hill 2," the film follows James (Jeremy Irvine) as he receives a mysterious letter from his lost love Mary, leading him back to the haunted town of Silent Hill.
While audiences have given the film a slightly more positive response than critics, with a 32% "rotten" rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on over 100 verified user reviews, the majority of professional reviewers have panned it. The consensus among top critics is that the film lacks the same level of uncanniness and eeriness as its video game counterpart.
Beatrice Loayza from the New York Times gave the film a "rotten" score, stating that it feels like a "jumbled assembly of cutscenes" rather than a cohesive horror experience. Jesse Hassenger from The Guardian also criticized the film, arguing that making a horror movie with a hero who is more curious than scared is a difficult proposition.
Jacob Oller from The AV Club went even further, calling the film "goofy and low-rent," stating that it fails to leave a lasting impression on audiences. In contrast, Simon Abrams of RogerEbert.com gave the film a "fresh" review score, praising its ability to deliver more of the same as the original game.
Dominic Baez from The Seattle Times also awarded the film a "fresh" score, although he noted that it doesn't hold up to the standard set by the video game. He praised the film's stylish credits and its ability to justify the viewer's decisions once the credits roll.
Overall, it seems that "Return to Silent Hill" has failed to live up to expectations from critics and audiences alike, leaving many wondering if this sequel is truly worth revisiting the haunted world of Silent Hill.