Scientists and Nonprofits Fight Back Against Trump's War on Climate Data, Rebuilding Critical Research Efforts.
President Donald Trump recently questioned the existence of global warming during a brutal winter storm in the US, despite overwhelming scientific evidence. However, his administration has been erasing climate change data from government websites and slashing funding for key research initiatives. The move has sent shockwaves through the scientific community, prompting a desperate but resilient effort by scientists and nonprofits to preserve vital information.
In the last year alone, the Trump administration has gutted climate science programs, including the dismantling of the National Center for Atmospheric Research and the removal of human-caused climate change from government websites. The move has left critical data sets, such as those collected by NOAA's Billion Dollar Climate and Weather Disaster dataset, in jeopardy.
Climate Central, a small nonprofit organization, has been at the forefront of this effort. "We don't have a ton of extra bandwidth to take on new projects or try to build things that have taken years to build for the federal government," said Kristina Dahl, vice president for science at Climate Central. However, the organization has successfully restored key projects, including the Billion Dollar Disaster dataset, by re-hiring laid-off scientists.
The Trump administration's actions are not only eroding trust in climate science but also threatening the country's ability to understand and mitigate the effects of climate change. Climate-related disasters have become increasingly common, with 2025 seeing one billion-dollar disaster event every 10 days on average. The past three years have been the hottest on record.
To address this crisis, scientists and nonprofits are working together to rebuild critical research efforts. This includes transferring sovereignty over climate research from the public sphere to the philanthropic sector, where organizations like Climate Central can focus on actionable projects rather than long-term maintenance. "We should strive to build a science infrastructure or a scientific foundation for this country that is responsive to the needs of the US population," said Janice Lachance, CEO of the American Geophysical Union.
The transfer of sovereignty has allowed these organizations to fine-grain climate disaster datasets and bring in guest speakers to discuss the latest research. However, they are also facing criticism from those who question the scientific consensus on climate change. Last summer, a group of 80 scientists responded with an independent fact-check that criticized a document arguing that climate change was not a catastrophe.
As the battle for climate science continues, scientists and nonprofits are imagining what independent research would look like after having carried an unprecedented burden. "We should strive to build a science infrastructure or a scientific foundation for this country that is responsive to the needs of the US population," said Lachance. "Not just in helping people conduct research, but also advocacy at the federal government level and maintaining a refuge where research cannot easily be deleted or overwritten."
President Donald Trump recently questioned the existence of global warming during a brutal winter storm in the US, despite overwhelming scientific evidence. However, his administration has been erasing climate change data from government websites and slashing funding for key research initiatives. The move has sent shockwaves through the scientific community, prompting a desperate but resilient effort by scientists and nonprofits to preserve vital information.
In the last year alone, the Trump administration has gutted climate science programs, including the dismantling of the National Center for Atmospheric Research and the removal of human-caused climate change from government websites. The move has left critical data sets, such as those collected by NOAA's Billion Dollar Climate and Weather Disaster dataset, in jeopardy.
Climate Central, a small nonprofit organization, has been at the forefront of this effort. "We don't have a ton of extra bandwidth to take on new projects or try to build things that have taken years to build for the federal government," said Kristina Dahl, vice president for science at Climate Central. However, the organization has successfully restored key projects, including the Billion Dollar Disaster dataset, by re-hiring laid-off scientists.
The Trump administration's actions are not only eroding trust in climate science but also threatening the country's ability to understand and mitigate the effects of climate change. Climate-related disasters have become increasingly common, with 2025 seeing one billion-dollar disaster event every 10 days on average. The past three years have been the hottest on record.
To address this crisis, scientists and nonprofits are working together to rebuild critical research efforts. This includes transferring sovereignty over climate research from the public sphere to the philanthropic sector, where organizations like Climate Central can focus on actionable projects rather than long-term maintenance. "We should strive to build a science infrastructure or a scientific foundation for this country that is responsive to the needs of the US population," said Janice Lachance, CEO of the American Geophysical Union.
The transfer of sovereignty has allowed these organizations to fine-grain climate disaster datasets and bring in guest speakers to discuss the latest research. However, they are also facing criticism from those who question the scientific consensus on climate change. Last summer, a group of 80 scientists responded with an independent fact-check that criticized a document arguing that climate change was not a catastrophe.
As the battle for climate science continues, scientists and nonprofits are imagining what independent research would look like after having carried an unprecedented burden. "We should strive to build a science infrastructure or a scientific foundation for this country that is responsive to the needs of the US population," said Lachance. "Not just in helping people conduct research, but also advocacy at the federal government level and maintaining a refuge where research cannot easily be deleted or overwritten."