Slipknot Drops Lawsuit Against Website Owner Amid Allegations of Bootleg Merch Sales
In a surprise move, Slipknot has voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit against the owner of Slipknot.com, a website allegedly selling unauthorized merchandise bearing the band's name and image. The decision comes just weeks after the band filed the suit, claiming that the domain owner had been engaged in "cybersquatting."
According to court documents obtained by Rolling Stone, Slipknot filed its lawsuit against the domain owner, listed as Slipknot Online Services, Ltd., citing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. The group alleged that the website was selling cheap promo products and costume masks without their permission, and that fans would unknowingly purchase these items thinking they were buying authorized merchandise.
However, just last month, lawyer Jeffrey Neuman filed a motion to dismiss on behalf of the domain owner, arguing that Slipknot waited too long to sue. The company claimed it had owned the domain for 24 years since its registration in February 2001 and was unaware of the lawsuit until it was served.
Now, Slipknot's lawyers have followed suit, filing their own motion to dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice. This means that the band could revive the case in the future if they choose to do so.
The website at issue, Slipknot.com, remains active but has no content on it, with a message stating "no valid delivery channels available for this domain" and copyrighting 2025. The official website of the band, Slipknot1.com, is still up and running, although there are currently no tour dates planned.
Representatives for Slipknot have declined to comment on the news, while lawyers for Slipknot Online Services, Ltd., did not immediately respond to Rolling Stone's request for a statement.
In a surprise move, Slipknot has voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit against the owner of Slipknot.com, a website allegedly selling unauthorized merchandise bearing the band's name and image. The decision comes just weeks after the band filed the suit, claiming that the domain owner had been engaged in "cybersquatting."
According to court documents obtained by Rolling Stone, Slipknot filed its lawsuit against the domain owner, listed as Slipknot Online Services, Ltd., citing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. The group alleged that the website was selling cheap promo products and costume masks without their permission, and that fans would unknowingly purchase these items thinking they were buying authorized merchandise.
However, just last month, lawyer Jeffrey Neuman filed a motion to dismiss on behalf of the domain owner, arguing that Slipknot waited too long to sue. The company claimed it had owned the domain for 24 years since its registration in February 2001 and was unaware of the lawsuit until it was served.
Now, Slipknot's lawyers have followed suit, filing their own motion to dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice. This means that the band could revive the case in the future if they choose to do so.
The website at issue, Slipknot.com, remains active but has no content on it, with a message stating "no valid delivery channels available for this domain" and copyrighting 2025. The official website of the band, Slipknot1.com, is still up and running, although there are currently no tour dates planned.
Representatives for Slipknot have declined to comment on the news, while lawyers for Slipknot Online Services, Ltd., did not immediately respond to Rolling Stone's request for a statement.