South Korea's prosecutors have formally requested the death penalty for former President Yoon Suk Yeol over his failed attempt to impose martial law last year. The special prosecutor's team accused Yoon of threatening South Korea's liberal democratic constitutional order with his self-coup, which led to a crisis in December 2024.
Yoon was impeached and removed from office after the Supreme Court declared his martial law decree unconstitutional. He is facing multiple trials over various charges related to the incident, including insurrection, abuse of power, and obstructing justice.
The prosecutors' request for the death penalty comes amid concerns that Yoon's actions posed a threat to the country's democratic institutions. The Seoul Central District Court will deliver its verdict on February 19.
Yoon has denied all charges against him, claiming he was acting within his authority to declare martial law in response to opposition parties' obstruction of government. However, he criticized investigations into the rebellion charges as "frenzied" and mired in manipulation and distortion.
If found guilty, Yoon will become the third South Korean president convicted of insurrection, following two ex-military leaders convicted over their roles in the 1979 coup. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that a death sentence would be carried out due to an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.
In addition to facing potential execution, Yoon also faces several other trials over various criminal charges related to the martial law attempt and other scandals during his time in office.
Yoon was impeached and removed from office after the Supreme Court declared his martial law decree unconstitutional. He is facing multiple trials over various charges related to the incident, including insurrection, abuse of power, and obstructing justice.
The prosecutors' request for the death penalty comes amid concerns that Yoon's actions posed a threat to the country's democratic institutions. The Seoul Central District Court will deliver its verdict on February 19.
Yoon has denied all charges against him, claiming he was acting within his authority to declare martial law in response to opposition parties' obstruction of government. However, he criticized investigations into the rebellion charges as "frenzied" and mired in manipulation and distortion.
If found guilty, Yoon will become the third South Korean president convicted of insurrection, following two ex-military leaders convicted over their roles in the 1979 coup. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that a death sentence would be carried out due to an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.
In addition to facing potential execution, Yoon also faces several other trials over various criminal charges related to the martial law attempt and other scandals during his time in office.
... like, I get that Yoon's actions were super questionable, but death penalty is a big deal! It's one thing to be held accountable for what you did, but executing him? That's just crazy talk 
. And on top of that, he's still denying all charges and saying the investigations are fishy 
... I'm not sure which side I'd take in this case, but I do know that South Korea needs to figure out a way to balance its democratic institutions with accountability for its leaders 
.
. Anyway, the trial's gonna be super intense on Feb 19... let's hope justice prevails! 
he thinks martial law is a good idea lol anyway, death penalty is way too easy for him, i'd want some serious rehabilitation programs first 
Can you imagine a scenario where politics gets so intense that it threatens the very fabric of democracy? For me, this is what's at stake when we're talking about Yoon Suk Yeol's attempted coup last year 
. The question is, where do we draw the line between legitimate action and authoritarian overreach? It's a gray area that requires careful consideration and nuanced discussion.
. Will it be in the form of a death penalty or something more lenient? Whatever the outcome, I hope this serves as a wake-up call for all of us to engage in thoughtful debates about the role of power and accountability in our democracy 
.
I'm not saying Yoon did anything wrong, but this whole thing is getting out of hand. And can we talk about how weird it is that a death sentence is even on the table? Like, isn't South Korea trying to move away from that kind of thing now? It's all just so... confusing 
. like what is going on with yoon suk yeol? he was president like only a year ago and now he's facing death penalty for trying to impose martial law? that's some serious power trip vibes 
. and the fact that he thinks he was acting within his authority is just laughable 
. i mean, if you're gonna try to declare martial law, at least have the decency to do it in a way that doesn't threaten the entire country's democratic institutions 
. and the fact that there's even an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997 is like, what's the point of even having a death penalty if it's not going to be carried out? 
. it's like, how can we trust our leaders to do what's best for us when they're not even afraid to try and take over? 
if the death penalty is even considered then it shows how deep the corruption and authoritarian tendencies go 
I'm not surprised they're asking for the death penalty, it's just a way to make sure justice is served right? 
I mean, trying to impose martial law is pretty serious stuff. But let's not forget that Yoon has denied all charges against him and there's still a long way to go before he gets his verdict.
We've seen what can happen when people try to abuse their power, so let's keep our fingers crossed that this trial will be a learning experience for everyone involved. 
he's basically saying his power is above the law and that's super concerning.
not cool, yoon. not cool at all.
but still, he should get some serious time behind bars for his crimes. and btw, this just shows how weak our justice system is in south korea 
like, can't they even protect the country from one of their own? 
. But death penalty? It's a pretty harsh punishment, you know? I think the prosecutors need to consider the bigger picture here - we can't just demonize one person for trying to take drastic action in response to opposition. I get that he overstepped his bounds, but it feels like this is all just getting really intense and partisan 