Tesla kills Autopilot, locks lane-keeping behind $99/month fee

Tesla's Latest Move Sparks Controversy Over Autopilot Subscription Fees.

In a move that's been welcomed by the company for its falling sales and dwindling profits, Tesla has announced a new subscription model for its Autopilot feature. The system, which combines adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, was initially priced at $8,000 upfront but will now become a recurring monthly fee of $99.

The decision comes amidst scrutiny over Autopilot's capabilities, particularly in regards to safety. Several wrongful death lawsuits have been filed against Tesla, with the company facing regulatory and legal pressure to improve its self-driving technology. In response, Elon Musk has revealed that the subscription fee will increase as the system becomes more capable, potentially including unsupervised FSD (Full Self-Driving) functionality.

The new model is part of a broader shift in the automotive industry towards recurring revenue streams. General Motors and BMW have already experimented with similar services, hoping to attract investors by encouraging regular payouts from customers. However, Tesla's decision has sparked concerns over transparency and affordability, particularly given the company's high stock price and dwindling profit margins.

As Tesla's largest market shrinks, California has been a significant source of revenue for the company. However, following an administrative law judge's ruling that Tesla misled customers about its cars' capabilities, Tesla was told to suspend sales in the state until it resolved the issue within 60 days. The decision would have been disastrous for Tesla but instead prompted the company to make Autopilot a paid subscription-only feature.

The news has left some commentators questioning why Tesla didn't take a more straightforward approach by changing the name of its Autopilot system rather than imposing a new fee structure. Regardless, the move is likely to be closely watched as the automotive industry continues to navigate its shift towards autonomous vehicles and recurring revenue streams.
 
๐Ÿค” i dont get why tesla would wanna make ppl pay more for autopilot... like, didnt they already charge them enough? ๐Ÿ˜’ and whats with the whole subscription thing? seems kinda sketchy ๐Ÿ“Š also, if they're not making profit off their sales in california anymore, then why are they still charging high prices there? โš ๏ธ it just feels like tesla's trying to squeeze every last penny from its customers, you feel me? ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
I'm kinda surprised they did this ๐Ÿค”... I mean, it's like they're trying to make Autopilot seem like a super premium thingy ๐Ÿ’ธ, but at the same time, it's just a system that's meant to help you drive safer ๐Ÿ˜Š. And with all those lawsuits and regulatory stuff going on, I get why they want to rake in some more cash ๐Ÿค‘... but $99 a month is just crazy talk! ๐Ÿ’ฅ Wouldn't it be better if they just made it a one-time thing or something? ๐Ÿ”
 
omg I'm literally FREAKING OUT over this new Autopilot subscription fee ๐Ÿคฏ! Like I get it, Tesla's profits are tanking and all, but $99 a month? That's just ridiculous! ๐Ÿ˜‚ I mean, what's next? ๐Ÿš—๐Ÿ’ธ They're gonna start charging us extra for breathing?! ๐Ÿคฃ Just kidding, sorta. But seriously, Elon Musk needs to come up with a better plan if he wants to keep his customers. Maybe they could offer some kind of discount or promotion to ease us into the new subscription model? That'd be so cool! ๐Ÿ˜Ž Or maybe they just need to work on those Autopilot safety features and get it done already?! ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ Either way, I'm keeping an eye on this situation, that's for sure! ๐Ÿ‘€
 
๐Ÿค” I gotta say, this new Autopilot subscription thingy has got me thinking... what's up with Tesla trying to make us pay for a system that's still super experimental? I mean, we're already being nickel-and-dimed on our electricity bills, now they wanna charge us extra for semi-autonomous driving? It just doesn't add up. And let's be real, $99 a month is some serious cash... ๐Ÿค‘ Not to mention the whole FSD thing, which sounds like a fancy way of saying "Tesla's gonna try and sell you on a car that can drive itself (but probably not as well as it claims)". I think they're trying too hard to make up for their declining sales and profits, but this just looks like a PR stunt to me... ๐Ÿš—๐Ÿ’ธ
 
omg I'm so confused about Tesla's latest move... like they're trying to make their Autopilot feature sound way more valuable than it actually is by turning it into a subscription service ๐Ÿค”. I get that the company needs to make money, but $99/month is kinda steep, even for a luxury car like the Model S.

I'm also worried about the safety implications of this new model, especially with Elon Musk mentioning unsupervised FSD functionality ๐Ÿšจ. We need more transparency and accountability from Tesla when it comes to its self-driving tech.

And can we talk about how this whole thing is just another example of how the automotive industry is slowly shifting towards recurring revenue streams? Like, what's next? Paying to park your car in a Tesla lot? ๐Ÿ˜‚

On the other hand, I guess it's interesting to see how other companies like GM and BMW are experimenting with similar services. Maybe this is the future we're heading towards... ๐Ÿš—๐Ÿ’ธ
 
๐Ÿš—๐Ÿ’ธ I'm not sure about this new subscription model for Autopilot... like, isn't it just supposed to make driving safer? ๐Ÿค” And what's up with the fee structure? $99 a month is kinda steep for something that's still got its limitations, right? ๐Ÿค‘ I mean, I get that Tesla wants to generate more revenue, but can't they find a better way to do it without messing with people's trust? ๐Ÿ’” It's like they're trying to nickel and dime us instead of innovating their tech... ๐Ÿ™„
 
I'm so done with Tesla's latest move ๐Ÿคฏ! I mean, come on, increasing Autopilot fees just when people are already skeptical about its capabilities? It's like they're nickel-and-diming us ๐Ÿ˜’. And what's up with the subscription model? $99 a month for something that's still not fully reliable? That's just crazy talk ๐Ÿ’ธ.

I get it, Tesla needs to make some cash and all, but couldn't they've done this in a more transparent way? Like, maybe offer a free trial or something? But nope, they had to go and slap on the subscription fee like it's going out of style ๐Ÿ“ฆ. And don't even get me started on the whole FSD thing... I'm just not convinced that's ready for prime time yet ๐Ÿ˜ณ.

It's just another reason why I'll be sticking with my trusty old GPS ๐Ÿ”‹, thank you very much!
 
I'm not sure I get why they gotta make it so complicated ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ, like, can't just give people a clear choice if they wanna use Autopilot or not? The $99 monthly fee is pretty steep, especially for ppl who already paid $8k upfront. And what's with the whole "as the system becomes more capable" thing? Sounds like just an excuse to nickel-and-dime customers even more ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
I'm not sure I agree with Tesla's decision to make Autopilot a subscription-based service ๐Ÿ˜•. On one hand, it can't be denied that the company needs to find ways to increase revenue and offset dwindling profits. However, I think they could have taken a more nuanced approach by introducing the paid feature gradually or offering tiered pricing options ๐Ÿค”.

The fact that the system will become increasingly capable and may include unsupervised FSD functionality raises valid concerns about safety and transparency ๐Ÿ’ก. As it stands, some customers might feel left in the dark about what they're paying for and how much more advanced their vehicle's capabilities are becoming ๐Ÿ”ฎ.

It's also worth noting that this move comes at a time when California's regulatory issues are still fresh on Tesla's mind ๐Ÿšจ. I'm curious to see how other companies, like General Motors and BMW, will respond to the trend of recurring revenue streams and whether they'll be able to navigate these challenges with more ease ๐Ÿ˜Š.

Ultimately, I think this decision will be closely watched by industry observers and regulators alike, and it will be interesting to see how Tesla addresses concerns about affordability and transparency ๐Ÿ‘€.
 
I'm low-key kinda on this new subscription model for Autopilot ๐Ÿค”... I mean, come on, it's not like people weren't expecting some kind of cost-cutting measure from Tesla when they're making bank with their cars being sold all over the place ๐Ÿ’ธ. On the other hand, $99 a month is pretty steep, even for a car that's worth tens of thousands ๐Ÿ’ฅ... I guess it's all about finding that sweet spot where profit meets consumer willingness to pay ๐Ÿค‘.

And honestly, can't blame Tesla for trying to get more money out of customers when they're already getting kinda slammed with all the lawsuits and regulatory drama ๐Ÿšซ. The thing is, this move feels like a bit of a cop-out โ€“ I mean, instead of really addressing the safety concerns, Tesla's just throwing their hands up and saying "oh well, we'll just charge you more" ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ... still, gotta respect the company for being proactive about it, right? ๐Ÿ™.
 
I'm low-key shocked that Tesla's going all-in on this subscription model ๐Ÿคฏ. On one hand, it makes total sense - if you're already investing in a Tesla, why not pay for the Autopilot feature too? But on the other, $99/month is still kinda steep, even for me ๐Ÿค‘. I get why they want to diversify their revenue streams and all that jazz ๐Ÿ’ธ, but it's gotta be hard for some customers who just can't swing that price tag ๐Ÿ’”.

And can we talk about how this is just another sign of Elon Musk being a genius CEO (in his own mind) ๐Ÿค“? I mean, who else could turn Autopilot from a feature into a paid subscription and still manage to get away with it ๐Ÿ˜. The drama around California's sales ban was already getting too much for me - this just adds fuel to the fire ๐Ÿ”ฅ.

I'm kinda intrigued to see how other car companies respond to Tesla's move, though ๐Ÿค”. Will they follow suit and start their own subscription models? Or will they stick with the traditional upfront payment approach? Only time (and Elon) will tell ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ.
 
I'm low-key shocked that Tesla decided to go down this route ๐Ÿค”. I mean, who wants to pay $99 a month for Autopilot? It's already pricey at $8k upfront, but now it's like they're nickel-and-diming us ๐Ÿ˜’. And with the whole safety thing, I get why they might want to increase the subscription fee as the tech improves... but still, transparency is key ๐Ÿ“Š. What if some people can't afford it? It just feels like another way for them to make money off of people's anxiety about self-driving cars ๐Ÿš—. And now that California's suspended sales, it'll be interesting to see how this plays out elsewhere ๐Ÿ‘€. Maybe the industry should've taken a different approach... like, I don't know, making Autopilot more accessible from the start? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
omg, like i get why tesla's doing this tho ๐Ÿค‘ their sales have been super slow lately & profits are dwindling lol what if ppl start boycotting coz they cant afford it tho? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ anyway, i think general motors & bmw r testing waters here ๐ŸŒŠ autonomous tech is the future, so whoever adapts first gets an edge ๐Ÿ’ฅ but like, $99 a month for autopilot? that's crazy ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
Back
Top