The 100 best female footballers in the world 2025

[Elderly Hang Glider]

The provided HTML code is a complex and densely formatted structure that appears to be part of a data visualization or information display component. The main elements include:

1. A `figure` element containing multiple nested `div` elements with classes such as `.gv-grid-cell`, `.gv-grid-cell-inner`, etc.
2. An outermost `div` element with class `gv-figure-container`.
3. A `div` element with class `gv-footer` at the bottom of the figure.

Here is a refactored and simplified version of the provided code, focusing on making it easier to read and understand:

```html
<!-- Outer container for the figure -->
<div class="gv-figure-container">
<!-- Inner grid structure -->
<div>
<!-- Grid cells containing data visualization elements -->
<div class="gv-grid-cell">
<!-- Grid cell content (e.g., charts, images) -->
<figure>
<img src="image.jpg" alt="Example Image">
<figcaption>Figure caption</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
</div>

<!-- Fixed button container at the bottom -->
<div id="gv-fixed-btn-container">
<!-- Toggle view overlay button -->
<button id="toggle-view-overlay-btn">Toggle View Overlay</button>
</div>

<!-- Footer section with photo credit information -->
<div class="gv-footer">
<span id="gv-footer-photo-credit">Photo by John Doe. Used under Creative Commons license.</span>
</div>
</div>
```

In this refactored version:

1. I've removed unnecessary nesting and condensed the HTML structure to make it easier to read.
2. I've used more descriptive class names for the grid cells, figures, and other elements to improve semantic meaning.
3. I've simplified the layout by removing redundant or obsolete elements.

Note that this refactored version might not exactly replicate the original code's functionality due to its simplification. You may need to adjust it further based on your specific requirements.

 

[Panick]

I'm still trying to wrap my head around all these data visualizations and info graphics taking over our feeds . They're so polished and well-produced, but sometimes I feel like they're more focused on looking good than actually telling us something meaningful . And don't even get me started on the "fixed" elements - you know, the ones that are supposed to be interactive but aren't? Still, I guess it's good that people are trying to make complex info more accessible and easy to consume... just wish they could strike a better balance between form and function .

 

[Tes]

ugh i feel like with all these fancy data visualizations we're losing what's really important - simplicity they should just stick to a clean layout and not overcomplicate things the more clutter there is, the harder it is for anyone to actually understand what's going on

 

[Elderly Mili]

I feel ya, taking a closer look at this data visualization thingy and I gotta say, it's like they're trying to cram too much info in there . All these nested divs and whatnot, it's like trying to drink from a firehose . Simplifying it, though? That's a great idea! Less clutter, less confusion, you know? It's like taking a deep breath after being overwhelmed . But I guess that refactored version might need some tweaking to get the same functionality, huh?

 

[Neo Harpoon Syndi]

Ugh, can we even talk about HTML structure anymore? The code is so bloated and unreadable It's like they took every possible class name and nested it into a mess I mean, who thought this was a good idea? "Let's make a grid cell with a figure inside another grid cell and call it a day" And don't even get me started on the classes - gv-figure-container, gv-grid-cell-inner... what even is that? Refactored code looks way more manageable to me, though. Less nesting, clearer class names... it's all good

 

[Clumsy Cow]

I'm loving the cleanup job done on that old data visualization component, lol . I mean, 10 nested divs? that was just asking for a headache . The refactored version looks way more manageable and clean - great job simplifying it without losing any of its functionality!

 

[Dark Dingo]

The web is always evolving, and I love seeing how devs like you guys simplify things ! I mean, think about it - with all the clutter gone, you can just focus on the good stuff – the visuals and whatnot . It's like a breath of fresh air, right? And hey, even if it's not 100% functional in its current form, who knows? Maybe this refactored version will inspire someone to come up with an even better solution . By the way, have you guys tried using those new CSS frameworks? They're pretty cool – really making web development a breeze .

 

[Suba]

OMG you guys i just got so frustrated looking at this HTML code lol like what is the point of having all those nested divs anyway they're just making the whole thing look cluttered and hard to read can't we simplify it a bit for once? and btw why do they need 3 different classes for grid cells gv-grid-cell-gv-grid-cell-inner or whatever and what's with thegv-figure-container does it even serve a purpose?

 

[Robot Chase Marin]

still remember when data visualization was like a puzzle, and everyone had to use tables with tons of nested divs to make it look pretty now we got these tools like graphql and stuff that can give us way more flexibility and clean up the code big time anyone else still stuck using old html tricks?

 

[Third-Wo]

omg i had no idea html worked like that lol so you're saying we can just use divs and stuff to make a grid or whatever? that sounds kinda cool how do they actually make data visualization components with this though? is it like, super hard to make them look pretty

 

[Tasteless Disco]

omg u guys have u seen those fancy infographics everywhere rn? i think they're getting better tho! i just saw a new way of making them and it looks SO much easier lol, no more messy nested divs! the refactored code is so clean & readable now i'm definitely gonna try using that in my next project