Smart Glass Maker XREAL Sues Viture for Patent Infringement
XREAL, a San Francisco-based company that specializes in smart glass technology, has filed a lawsuit against its rival Viture, alleging that Viture's products infringe on its patented innovations. The complaint, which was lodged in a federal court in Texas, accuses Viture of incorporating XREAL's patented tech into its Luma Pro, Luma Ultra, and Beast models without permission.
According to the lawsuit, the issue is not just about enforcing a single patent but rather about stopping Viture from repeatedly infringing on XREAL's intellectual property. XREAL claims that this pattern of infringement is undermining innovation in the industry and puts technological development at risk.
This is not the first time XREAL has taken action against Viture. The company had already won a preliminary injunction against Viture in Germany, which resulted in a sales freeze in that country. As a result, Viture's Pro, Luma, and Luma Pro smart glasses are now unavailable for purchase in nine European nations, including France, Italy, and Spain.
Viture has responded to the lawsuit by denying any wrongdoing, stating that its product does not infringe on XREAL's patent in any way. The company has also taken issue with XREAL's claims, calling them "false" and suggesting that XREAL is trying to undermine Viture's business through misinformation.
This dispute highlights the intense competition in the smart glass market, where companies are racing to develop innovative products that can deliver immersive augmented reality experiences. With both companies making AR glasses with built-in displays that connect to smartphones or laptops, the stakes are high for anyone involved in this space.
XREAL claims to hold over 800 patents and patent applications related to AR and VR technology worldwide, whereas Viture has fewer than 70 patents and none in the US and Europe. XREAL's move could be seen as a precursor to similar actions by other companies looking to protect their intellectual property.
The outcome of this lawsuit is uncertain, but it is clear that both companies are deeply invested in the smart glass market and will not back down without a fight.
XREAL, a San Francisco-based company that specializes in smart glass technology, has filed a lawsuit against its rival Viture, alleging that Viture's products infringe on its patented innovations. The complaint, which was lodged in a federal court in Texas, accuses Viture of incorporating XREAL's patented tech into its Luma Pro, Luma Ultra, and Beast models without permission.
According to the lawsuit, the issue is not just about enforcing a single patent but rather about stopping Viture from repeatedly infringing on XREAL's intellectual property. XREAL claims that this pattern of infringement is undermining innovation in the industry and puts technological development at risk.
This is not the first time XREAL has taken action against Viture. The company had already won a preliminary injunction against Viture in Germany, which resulted in a sales freeze in that country. As a result, Viture's Pro, Luma, and Luma Pro smart glasses are now unavailable for purchase in nine European nations, including France, Italy, and Spain.
Viture has responded to the lawsuit by denying any wrongdoing, stating that its product does not infringe on XREAL's patent in any way. The company has also taken issue with XREAL's claims, calling them "false" and suggesting that XREAL is trying to undermine Viture's business through misinformation.
This dispute highlights the intense competition in the smart glass market, where companies are racing to develop innovative products that can deliver immersive augmented reality experiences. With both companies making AR glasses with built-in displays that connect to smartphones or laptops, the stakes are high for anyone involved in this space.
XREAL claims to hold over 800 patents and patent applications related to AR and VR technology worldwide, whereas Viture has fewer than 70 patents and none in the US and Europe. XREAL's move could be seen as a precursor to similar actions by other companies looking to protect their intellectual property.
The outcome of this lawsuit is uncertain, but it is clear that both companies are deeply invested in the smart glass market and will not back down without a fight.